Same-sex Marriage? |
Yes for Same-sex Marriage |
|
47% |
[ 18 ] |
Religion out of the Gov't Civil Unions for All |
|
13% |
[ 5 ] |
Same-sex Civil Unions are Okay |
|
7% |
[ 3 ] |
No |
|
31% |
[ 12 ] |
|
Total Votes : 38 |
|
|
|
|
Rainbowfied Mouse Vice Captain
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:28 pm
|
|
|
|
haydenhearts Rainbowfied Mouse haydenhearts Rainbowfied Mouse haydenhearts i think ppl need 2 just drop it and like i said is they truly luv each other then they don't need it on paper.... heart This should include straight marriage too then. well no..... i think marriage is between a man and a woman.... but there should be some way for gay couples to be legally 2gether but no it should not b called marriage Why? You stated they should drop it because you don't need love on paper to prove it? And why can't it be called marriage? Are we not all equal citizens? im well aware of wat i said! stressed ur really buging me! okay here let me spell it out 4 you. they SHOULD drop it and although they shouldnt need it on paper if their TRULY in love, but there should be some way for them 2 get it legally done if they r that bent about it got it!?!?
Okay, but why gay people, and not straight people as well?
And why not marriage, why does it have to be different?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:03 pm
|
|
|
|
Rainbowfied Mouse haydenhearts Rainbowfied Mouse haydenhearts Rainbowfied Mouse haydenhearts i think ppl need 2 just drop it and like i said is they truly luv each other then they don't need it on paper.... heart This should include straight marriage too then. well no..... i think marriage is between a man and a woman.... but there should be some way for gay couples to be legally 2gether but no it should not b called marriage Why? You stated they should drop it because you don't need love on paper to prove it? And why can't it be called marriage? Are we not all equal citizens? im well aware of wat i said! stressed ur really buging me! okay here let me spell it out 4 you. they SHOULD drop it and although they shouldnt need it on paper if their TRULY in love, but there should be some way for them 2 get it legally done if they r that bent about it got it!?!? Okay, but why gay people, and not straight people as well? And why not marriage, why does it have to be different? the definition on marriage is man+woman....besides marriage is a sacred religious symbol.... or at least it used to be and it still should be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:24 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:40 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rainbowfied Mouse Vice Captain
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:32 pm
|
|
|
|
haydenhearts the definition on marriage is man+woman....besides marriage is a sacred religious symbol.... or at least it used to be and it still should be
Where is that definition? I get
Quote: Main Entry: mar·riage Pronunciation: ˈmer-ij, ˈma-rij Function: noun Etymology: Middle English mariage, from Anglo-French, from marier to marry Date: 14th century an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities
And-- don't we have the freedom of religion? Because my church says same-sex marriage is okay... and so do many others. Why can the government limit the rights of my church?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:04 pm
|
|
|
|
Rainbowfied Mouse haydenhearts the definition on marriage is man+woman....besides marriage is a sacred religious symbol.... or at least it used to be and it still should be Where is that definition? I get Quote: Main Entry: mar·riage Pronunciation: ˈmer-ij, ˈma-rij Function: noun Etymology: Middle English mariage, from Anglo-French, from marier to marry Date: 14th century an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalitiesAnd-- don't we have the freedom of religion? Because my church says same-sex marriage is okay... and so do many others. Why can the government limit the rights of my church? wow u keep trying 2 make it sound like i have something against them being 2gether.... y does it matter if they can call it marriage its not like im saying they can't have a wedding and love each other and were did u get that definition??? what date was it published and by whom question
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:59 am
|
|
|
|
Semiremis Lord Bitememan haydenhearts but the other churches will be pressured into it.... u do realize this right.... Pressured by whom? Their believers? That sounds just fine to me. Other than that organizations in the US have a long and firm tradition of defending their independence and internal practices, and I doubt highly that they will cave to pressures from outside groups. I don't think that's what most of those who present that type of argument are worried about. I'm guessing it has more to do with financial pressures, where state funding intertwines with religiously based institutions.
And those are the fleas that come with the dog of taking public money. You are expected to use that money in a manner consistent with the laws and protections of the land. Just as we would expect to deny funds to a Nation of Islam charity that refused to provide services to whites, so too does the public have a right to expect that public funds used by religious institutions will not discriminate against citizens on the basis of sexual orientation. Churches, more than any other group, can opt out of this by declining public money and relying on their own donor base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|