|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:15 am
|
|
|
|
How is 'The Idiot Boy' made of rainbows? And 'Goody Blake and Harry Gill'? They're depressing and realistic, especially the latter. The latter has a good moral, but it contains no romance for me.
And quite frankly, yes, 'Expostulation and Reply' and 'Tables Turned' do contain elements of romance, as it's all about flinging yourself into the country and embracing its greatness, but all I see is Wordsworth and his friend... whatever his name, arguing! That's not romantic! Well, I don't find it romantic, anyway!
Meh. I just haven't read a single romantic Wordsworth poem. Maybe because all of 'Lyrical Ballads' contains dark, sinister stuff. Coleridge certainly makes it so, with his changelings and so on. Wordsworth I much prefer, and I do love his poetry - I get what he's getting at and I actually agree - I just don't find it in any way romantic. Maybe I just don't have the same romanticism as you... and those Romantic poets. The romance of then and the romance of now are different, and I consider romance to be, and prefer, the romance of now.
xd I can't remember why we're debating Wordsworth and Romantic poetry. Lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:49 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:58 am
|
|
|
|
Well, I'm not sure whether or not you're talking about romance or Romanticism. Because Wordsworth and Coleridge are Romantic poets of the Romantic period, but they're not romantics - not if you mean modern-day 'romantics'. Those are typical girls squealing and waiting for their knight in shining white armour to come and sweep them off their feet. Romanticists are people interested in nature and stuff like that, like W&C and 'Lyrical Ballads'. Fantastic poems, but contains not a single trace of today's romanticism - the 'superficial' type.
But the difference of romance then and romance now... It is different. The romance of then, well, see Jane Austen. The romance of now, see... chick lit. xd Obviously, the feelings of love and stuff haven't changed, but society and situations have changed. You wouldn't have people wooing each other over the Internet. You wouldn't have lesbians and gays in their own special clubs having a great time. Romance was the same in the old days, but because of its own social boundaries and walls, it was confined to be expressed in different ways. And the view of romance has changed too. I'm sure back then they weren't too interested in chocs and roses. No, it was more important if the prospective partner had a good background and family name, and so on. That's what I was getting at.
Meh. I could on forever about literature. I am planning on doing it at uni. rolleyes Or rather, hoping. whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 6:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:41 am
|
|
|
|
@Mini: Yeah, I want to do pure English Literature at uni - it's surprisingly and ridiculously competitive. stressed Wish me luck, lol. I'm going to be sending off my application soon. whee
And lol, no, I'm not as literary as that. I just get very into it when there's a discussion, but it doesn't revolve around my life. I mean, I love art and music just as much, if not in some aspects more. Tbh, I'm not amazing at English, which is why I worried about going to uni to do it - didn't think I was good enough. But it's what I want to do, and I don't want my ability - or rather, my perceived self ability - to effect me. I considered History, but I just can't imagine doing it.
@cbc: xd Lol, I wouldn't describe Niph and I as BFF, but it is a reason we're good friends, ain't it, Niph? *laughs*
Indeed, I getcha now. rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:16 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:02 am
|
|
|
|
Chibito7 rofl @ cbc @Mini: I love to read. And I love to analyse. And I'm sure when I get to uni, literature will be my life. I'm not surprised other such students turn become obsessed with their subjects - after all, they are spending three years of their lives dedicated to it, it is your life. It's bound to take over, lol. But at the same time, I'm sure I'll still be very in tune with my music, especially my choral stuff. I couldn't survive without being in a choir, so my unis had better let me join some sort of choir, otherwise I will turn into a complete English Literature freak of a student. xd
Of course, I wholeheartedely recommend you join a University Association such as music. That way, you'll still have an active social life outside of your studies and you'll get to involve yourself in uni life. Unfortunately for me, I failed to take an active part in any association. I joined the debating and anime clubs in the first year, but I didn't attend any meetings; I became addicted to the student union library.
@Cbc: Hey, it doesn't matter if you can't read well and suck at listening to music. You might be a genius at science or maths. Generally those who suck at writing excel at maths and other calculations, as their brains are wired to rote memorize stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 6:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|