|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 9:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:38 pm
|
|
|
|
Nero I don't mean to challenge you but everyone has two jobs in the forces. My post said that before. They have the force and then their job. Like; an army chef.
If you're going to make a separate section for medical you'll need to make a section for everything else. Hospitality, CSO (combat system operators), GD (General duties), emergency team, communication, electronic technician, marine technician, mechanic, driver, riflemen, specials, photographer, musician, physical trainer, supply, an so on.
I know that Americans do have a lot more dealing with civilians. Australian Navy has its own firefighters within the Navy. Whereas Americans have civilians on their ships at sea. I just thought it would be cooler to make it more realistic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:40 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:57 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:42 pm
|
|
|
|
As with every other job in our military, medical is strictly volunteer. The fact is that some people don't want to enter the combat setting for one reason or another. I have in my travels, seen people who do not wish to fight but to stay behind the lines for the purpose of support while remaining pacifist in politics. Some of our medics do choose to sit and wait for emergencies, which is perfectly acceptible, but those who are willing are perfectly allowed to attatch themselves to a unit and travel into the field, firing their weapon if need be or if they want to create a firefight themselves.
As for the branch segment, I guess the baseline answer is that it makes for ease of organization. The neat thing about the branch aspect is that the medics, if they choose to go into the field, are not bound to one specific branch, but can alternate attatchments if need be. For instance, if a medic is needed more for a Marine landing rather than an Air Assault strike, then the medic can be easily sent to the Marine branch without having to worry about chain of command and such and a unit's ownership over a medic. Is this helpful? I apologize for sounding condescending if I am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|