|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:53 pm
Look at the statistics...there is at least 75% more people on this Earth than there was 100 years prior. The world is in a crisis, and what are we going to do?
Problem 1: Culture. History lesson. In India, it is considered an honor and a privelage to be blessed with a baby boy as they will...
A) Carry on the family lineage B) Cremate/bury their parents C) Receive hoards of gifts from their bride's family
This is the first problem. The people in India want boys, leading many people to continuously have children in order to grant their wish of a baby boy. One family had 4 girls and were still trying for a boy.
In Japan, it's the same freaking thing...minus the abortions. They'll have a girl, but a boy is preferabel. Because let's face it, when I girl get's married there goes your maiden name, forever lost in history. Cry your eyes out parents, what are you gonna do?
Problem 2: China. That's right, I'm blaming China directly. Why they have so many people there, I don't know, I guess the sex is really good in China There's more people in that country than there are in Canada and America COMBINED. This has led the country to put a strict ban on how many children they can have, a maximum of two. But the damage is done and they're just going to keep multiplying.
Problem 3: More people = Less resources and More problems. Us humans are a growing problem. If you aren't informed, the world is on a tight rope, we have global warming as one issue and non renewable resources as another. We are like a virus, when one area is no longer reusable or is not sufficient for living or growth we move to another place to do the same thing. More people create more problems.
Problem 4: How we can control overpopulation. In essence, we really can't. Limiting the number of children one can have won't really help, considering how high the population already is, we're still increasing the world's population no matter what. Also, killing off people isn't either, its still a crime regardless and rolls under a certain category...genocide.
What is your opinion on the matter. Is it a growing problem?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:09 pm
Your qite right, the Earth is overpopulated, and we've bypassed completely the holding capacity of this world. I hate to say it, but what we need it a massive world war that anhilates the vast majority of the population, and forcing us to revert to a more passive, controlled way of living, and reproducing...
Its a dark dream, but that's the only solution I feel is possible... =/
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:24 pm
i think .. maybe we should find somewhere else to live .. like i ' m not saying the moon or anything .. of course that ' d be pretty good too .. but anywhere that we can produce food , & resources we need to survive .
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 2:20 pm
I think they should have limit of 3 kids per couple
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:42 pm
You're absolutely right. I'm not going to agree with Seph and say that there should be some war to annihilate a large population, but China's already passed that One-Child law (or whatever the name is). If USA and Canada has that law too, the population will die down eventually, because (duh!) it takes two people to produce one child.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:38 pm
You are so right.People need to help the children that are already born.And keep it so we can have good things still in this world.Soon enough there won't be enough room on Earth for the animals.Like the tigers and all.If there weren't so many people on this planet we wouldn't have any of the problems.And another thing is why would they just let a girl lead a village in India.It's just so stupid that they would want a guy to run the village all the time.It doesn't make sense.Girls can be as strong as a male can be.This is true in fact.But I really don't get why people wouldn't just adopt a baby or orphan.It would be better off in this world if they did.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:04 am
Well, some of the overly religious types that don't believe in condoms should just get over themselves and stick it on it already. In some countries, you also have to understand that more children is an insurance policy. The more children you have, then the bigger the chance you have of a few surviving, and therefore there will be one or two to care for you in your old age. This is a big thing in African countries and other third world countries in poverty. A large issue contributing to over population is lack of food and medicinal care. When they are having more children for working the land and to care for them in their old age, but then not having enough food or money to buy food for their large and growing family is a common problem, what are they supposed to do? Especially with the people here in America (I don't know that everyone here is from the US, but I am) are making gas out of corn when it could be used to feed the starving people in the world. But no, some people just need to fill their fatty tank of a Hummer to get 14 MPG. And if they can't even buy food for themselves, they most certainly cannot buy the medicine their family needs, so if one child is in bad condition and most likely not gonna make it, that's fine. More where that one came from. But the food issue is huge, even more so when they need the extra kids to farm the land and such.
Whoa, a little long their. Kinda started to ramble. I may edit and fix this up a little later, as I am tired and it's three am for me, so I'm in a partial daze.
:]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:11 am
Leaders_apprentice You are so right.People need to help the children that are already born.And keep it so we can have good things still in this world.Soon enough there won't be enough room on Earth for the animals.Like the tigers and all.If there weren't so many people on this planet we wouldn't have any of the problems.And another thing is why would they just let a girl lead a village in India.It's just so stupid that they would want a guy to run the village all the time.It doesn't make sense.Girls can be as strong as a male can be.This is true in fact.But I really don't get why people wouldn't just adopt a baby or orphan.It would be better off in this world if they did. Well, the issue with animals isn't the population of people so much as the deforestation. And for the girl in India, that isn't strange in their culture. They are married off young anyways. The way they run their country is not the same as Europe or North America. We can't be so quick to judge all of this. It sucks, but she is one of many. And for the adoption, there are many problems with it. It'd be nice to adopt and everything, but not everyone can for different reasons. It's good that it is restricted, but if someone is medically diagnosed for having inflicted self harm upon ones’ self or others, even if it was in adolescence, they are unable to adopt from this country (assuming you are from America). They can adopt from other countries, and that's nice, but that is difficult for most people, especially when there is a language and cultural difference.
:]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:12 am
Eilzhaise You're absolutely right. I'm not going to agree with Seph and say that there should be some war to annihilate a large population, but China's already passed that One-Child law (or whatever the name is). If USA and Canada has that law too, the population will die down eventually, because (duh!) it takes two people to produce one child. North America is not in the same population crisis as China.
:]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:14 am
Exodia532 I think they should have limit of 3 kids per couple Why don't you think about that for a moment. The average number of children between married couples in the US is roughly two. Add another to every family, and then there is an issue.
:]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:16 am
baynginbilly i think .. maybe we should find somewhere else to live .. like i ' m not saying the moon or anything .. of course that ' d be pretty good too .. but anywhere that we can produce food , & resources we need to survive . Earth is so far the only known planet in our system to provide the suitable conditions for life that humans need. Plus, humans are not that advanced yet. Sure, we can visit the moon. But that's it. Otherwise, it's robotics that has gone to other planets.
:]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:44 pm
I admit, my "worship" of Adolph Hitler and his undeniable ability to dominate and completely control the will of nations is a bit unnerving, even to myself. I've always had a fascination for his brilliance..
But the "extinction of lesser races," while it sounds morally, completely wrong, is hard to not even consider inside of your own head when we've got a population crisis on the rise.. Think of all of the people on the planet who know next to nothing, and who live in shambles.. A HORRIBLE life, to be sure, I believe would be more merciful to end it.. Almost the entire african continent, the middle east, the quite a large amount of people in mexico and south america.. The countries themselves have next to nothing, and contribute hardly anything to the world, yet their people continue to reproduce, and poverty continues to rise. I mean.. The mexicans have to flee their own country to try and make a life for themselves here in America, because they live so poorly in their country..
I have to admit, I'm a very "primal" person.. I believe in "survival of the fittest" and when it comes down to it, the majority of people on this earth, if people were living "wild".. They would not be here. The weak would be gone, and the strong would survive. It's how a species grows and becomes stronger. The weak just drag it down.. And that is what's happening today. The weak aren't dying off, and instead, are bringing down the strong, by taking resources without consequence..
Call me brutal, call me harsh, call me sick.. I like to call it thinking outside of the morally and religiously shackled box.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:55 am
Not all of those countries are useless. The middle east is important to the United States, as that is the biggest spot of oil in the world, though not a good thing, is neccessary for the time being. Brazil is ok, though overall kinda iffy.
:l
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 12:15 am
~Love Will Tear Us Apart~ Not all of those countries are useless. The middle east is important to the United States, as that is the biggest spot of oil in the world, though not a good thing, is neccessary for the time being. Brazil is ok, though overall kinda iffy.
:l The middle-eastern countries themselves are, yes, useless. The LAND, however, is not. Because of, that's right, the oil.
But the vast majority of people are ignorant.
Therefor, quite useless.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|