|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 9:26 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 2:32 pm
|
|
|
|
Kitsuta I think it's good that you went one step further and infused symbolism into your photography -- the willingness to go the extra mile in your work makes the difference between producing good art and producing GREAT art.
Thank you so much! The teacher thought so as well. I got an A+ for this one.
Kitsuta Just a few nitpicks -- my monitor can handle very dark colors, and I did look at the full view, and I came to the conclusion that the hands get a bit too dark. Especially the 'closed' hand; I see what you were trying to do with the harsh lighting, but it blends in too much with the black matte you have around the two photographs and confuses the eye quite a bit, especially on the smaller version. I would recommend you give the hand more space like you did with the 'open' hand. I know you probably wanted to give the closed hand more emotion by making it bigger, but IMHO tranquility is just as strong of an emotion as anger/violence. It's up to you. If you can't/don't change it, that's fine.
I have two monitors and one is older so I can understand the problem of it looking too dark. But trust me. Face to face the piece's contrast is right on. The problem in this case is a technical one because of the hardward used to view it.
On the sizing... I hate to say this but... well, it just happened like that. I think it is mainly because the 'angery' hand is comming at us i.e. it is for-shortened. Where-as the other hand is resting at a different angle is is to the side.
I felt the balance was fine between them. I think the problem you are having with the closed fist might be because it is right up against the edge of the viewing area. Trust me, with the side borders it looks more like it is slamming into them adding to the effect.
Kitsuta Another thing.. the black matte is all well and good, but it makes the piece look a little unfinished for two reasons. One is that it's uneven for no discernable reason -- why is there more black on top? Why isn't there any black on the sides? It doesn't make sense. I know your school project might constrict you on this, but I would love some kind of title on the bottom to make this piece a little more polished.
I'm sorry you feel it loses something because of the matting. The matting was done by hand per the instructer's specs. The label is on the back. We have a particular label we must use and a certain spot on the back of the piece where it must be placed.
I am a Communication Design major at TSU and our teachers are professionals in their individual fields. They all take presentation compleatly seriously and all student work is not only expected, but required to meet industry standards.
This was done for my first ComDes Foundation's course. So he was the most easy going on the mouting as it is going to get for me. He broke it down to the basic steps. I.E. We were not required to put on a 'cover flap' which is trasparancy paper that covers the front, perfecty to size and shape, with a 2'' tapered back that must be attatched with white masking tape. With the tape the corners must be trimmed to contenue the vertical that the tapered back of the transparency paper creates.
And thats not getting into dimentions. The norm for dimentions is 2'' top and sides and the 3'' bottom. For this he had different dimentions for the piece. Though, I believe that the side edges are actually 2'' ea. at least... maybe 3''? I am at work right now so I will let you know later. In anycase, I believe that the edges were trimmed off due to the limited size of my scanner. If you think it is seriously detrimental I can photograph the piece, or maybe add the border in again digitially as photographing a piece instead of scanning usually loses something.
Thank you so much for the feedback! I hope to see more people not only respond to my stuff, but start posting their stuff as well!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 2:10 pm
|
|
|
|
Katherdante,
I understand about the hardware thing. This isn't a new monitor, but it usually doesn't have a problem with viewing things that are too dark. If you say it looks fine IRL, that's good enough for me.
xd You have good luck, haha. No, it looks fine, the only problem was with the blending because my monitor didn't differentiate. 3nodding
In retrospect, the balance IS fine, the only real problem was the contrast.
Oh my! That's quite a strict course! :O Well if it was supposed to be done a certain way then that's fine.
I didn't think about the scanner cutting it off, but that makes sense. You can edit it on the computer if you wish to -- I think it might look better, but it looks good anyway. 3nodding
I might post something later. Right now I can't think of anything.. most of the websites I am working on, have not been published yet... sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 12:19 am
|
|
|
|
Kitsuta Katherdante, I understand about the hardware thing. This isn't a new monitor, but it usually doesn't have a problem with viewing things that are too dark. If you say it looks fine IRL, that's good enough for me. xd You have good luck, haha. No, it looks fine, the only problem was with the blending because my monitor didn't differentiate. 3nodding In retrospect, the balance IS fine, the only real problem was the contrast. Oh my! That's quite a strict course! :O Well if it was supposed to be done a certain way then that's fine. I didn't think about the scanner cutting it off, but that makes sense. You can edit it on the computer if you wish to -- I think it might look better, but it looks good anyway. 3nodding I might post something later. Right now I can't think of anything.. most of the websites I am working on, have not been published yet... sweatdrop
I had my parents bring it up when they visited me and the border is compleatly different. 2 in on top and sides, 3 on bottom like I said were the usual specs. When I have a chance I will edit it digitally to refect that. *nod*
Thanks for the feedback. And yes... they are very specific. It is not just one course but my major. xd
And show what ever you want/can. It just has to be your work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 7:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 1:49 pm
|
|
|
|
Kitsuta Name: Kitsuta Critique for: Rurouni Kenshin, Legendary Battousai General impression: Please do not use copyrighted images in your works. Unfortunately, sukiher, it is apparent that not everything in your layout is copyrighted to you. It's technically copyright infringement to use copyrighted images in your layouts, banners, etc, and besides the words and lay out of the images, the piece does not fully belong to you. Thus, I can't really critique it. sweatdrop Is that honestly true? I find that very hard to believe. sweatdrop As long as you're not making money off it, you don't claim it as yours, and you at least aknowledge whose it rightfully is, is it copyright infringement?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 9:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2005 6:00 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|