|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 8:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:33 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:53 pm
|
|
|
|
Maiden Ophelia grimble grumble 0.9999~ = 1.
that severly pisses me off. There is a way with limits in college calculus to prove it, I just don't remember how to at the time. Hey! I vaguely remember doing that...but I don't have my calc notebook with me currently so I can't say how it is done...
Are you sure it was 2+2=5? And that DNA did it? Because I remember hearing sometime (okay, I'm gonna get the numbers wrong cause I don't have H2G2 with me either, but you know when they're trying to figure out the question and they say 6 x 7 and then they say two other numbers like (for the sake of argument and this example) 9 x 4?) that someone (a H2G2 fan) had proved that 9 x 4 did indeed equal 42 when it was done in a base other than 10...and that probably made no sense to anyone... sweatdrop
(and I'm a little confused about why .99999=1 is annoying...?)
EDIT: Ahaha!! Yay for wingnut!! She wrote this in another thread:
wingnut "What do you get if you multiply six by nine?" (which is, of course, not forty-two except in base thirteen).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 8:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:48 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:49 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|