|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 10:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 8:00 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 4:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:58 pm
|
|
|
|
Maeko-Hana I quite liked Amy's narrative, even though I've been a who fan for ages upon millenia, i thought it was nice...and helpful to people new to the show, or those who didn't see the last season. Those monsters are terrifying, they put the weeping angels to shame! I can't wait for part 2! I really wish it had been a 2 hour premiere episode, instead of a 2-parter...too many questions and curiosities.
1st point: Yeah, there are a lot of people who are new to the show who needed that little narration. There was a lot of hype for this season, so there's bound to be a lot more people.
2st point: They are pretty scary, but I still like the weeping angels better. They do have the same sort of context though, don't they. That they rely on sight.
3rd point: Yeah, it would have worked better as 2 hours, it just didn't have enough in it for me for 1 episode, but Moffat wants us to be in suspense, and so we must be
geekwho Amy isn't pregnant to me because River Song was experiencing the same sickness after viewing and forgetting the aliens. Also, I am for sure that the room that River Song unlocked is the same one as the one in the episode "The Lodger". Perhaps the girl in the space suit is just bait like that episode.
1st point: I'm sure she is, she probably checked. I don't think she thinks she is because she's just been feeling a bit sick. I think she only remembered to tell him because she still subconsciously remembers the monster telling her to
2nd point: It's the same sort of thing, but not exactly the same. Wasn't the one in "The Lodger" suppose to be a TARDIS sort of thing? I guess this is one two, but not the same one. And if it is one of them, it has a crew (the monsters), it doesn't need a pilot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 7:38 pm
|
|
|
|
SaphiraStar Ducks and Fowls 2nd point: It's the same sort of thing, but not exactly the same. Wasn't the one in "The Lodger" suppose to be a TARDIS sort of thing? I guess this is one two, but not the same one. And if it is one of them, it has a crew (the monsters), it doesn't need a pilot. actually they used the exact same set so i can only assume it's the same thing. are we going to talk about part two here or start a new one for that? Discuss it here is my vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|