Welcome to Gaia! ::

After the last one it felt like the team just didn't understand Fun > Realism. I understand what they where making was intended to show the reality of what actual soldiers go through, but the game just didn't add up into a good time. then the online felt slapped together. It's easy to slap something together that looks like call of duty and say "yup it's a Tripple A shooter" but what makes it a tripple A shooter? The quality of the game, or the amount of money put into its development (usually huge numbers as they need to cram the games completion time within 2 years on multiple platforms.)

I'm not saying this game is bad, or that the last was bad. I'm more saying it doesn't look like something I would recommend to anyone for a pre order. I know theres reasons to hate call of duty. Actavision are mean heads, the community is made of poo. But honestly what online game doesn't have a community of jerks? and what publisher isn't made up of a group of suits who are worse than the community because all they care about is money.

Just seems like this game is being made more as a "we can stick it to you Actavision!" from EA, as opposed to a game with any heart in it.