|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:59 pm
I can't believe this! So wrong and backwards! STUPID idiots! Here's the article guys! SHAME ON THEM for suspending the WRONG students! They were heroes! stressed
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:36 pm
"without intent" to kill.
Bull s**t. Excuse my french but bull s**t. "was 'pointing the gun directly' at another student and 'threatening to shoot him.'"
People are going insane these days. How can you punish someone for protecting other students like that? And I mean that seriously.
Would the principal rather have blood on his hands?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darkness Dragons Revenge Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:36 am
According to the referral, he was suspended for being part of an "incident" where a weapon was present and given an "emergency suspension."
Seriously? Then shouldn't the guy who was being threatened also be suspended for taking part in the 'incident'?
Sh*t makes no sense to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
