|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:26 pm
Click the button in my sig and sign the petition to give captains (and possibly jr captains) access to the guild funds. Doesn't it suck having 38427931 gold in there that no one can use on anything but subforums? :XP:
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:45 am
I heard they're rewriting the guild system.
But Vice Captains should NOT have access to funds, EVER.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:12 am
I will sign the petition and I disagree about vice captains not having access to the gold. It is for guild use, and the captain isn't always available to disperse the funds, like for contests. I think Captains and Vice Captains should be the only ones to have access, though. In this guild's case, one of the vice captains is the guild mule where we now store our gold for prizes, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:18 am
mamarita I will sign the petition and I disagree about vice captains not having access to the gold. It is for guild use, and the captain isn't always available to disperse the funds, like for contests. I think Captains and Vice Captains should be the only ones to have access, though. In this guild's case, one of the vice captains is the guild mule where we now store our gold for prizes, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:32 am
i signed that alot time ago lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:25 am
The main problem is making sure that the gold goes toward the guild, instead of into the guild captain's pocket. This is what the old system insures, but due to the fact that we can really only use it for sub forums people are disgruntled. I'm not sure if I'd want the captains able to use those funds directly, but I do agree that the gold is really kind of pointless at the moment. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 1:03 pm
MemoryDragon The main problem is making sure that the gold goes toward the guild, instead of into the guild captain's pocket. This is what the old system insures, but due to the fact that we can really only use it for sub forums people are disgruntled. I'm not sure if I'd want the captains able to use those funds directly, but I do agree that the gold is really kind of pointless at the moment. sweatdrop
I have maybe 17,000+ gold in my guild, and I am sure I won't buy any sub-forums anymore gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 4:06 pm
T3h_Evil_King MemoryDragon The main problem is making sure that the gold goes toward the guild, instead of into the guild captain's pocket. This is what the old system insures, but due to the fact that we can really only use it for sub forums people are disgruntled. I'm not sure if I'd want the captains able to use those funds directly, but I do agree that the gold is really kind of pointless at the moment. sweatdrop
I have maybe 17,000+ gold in my guild, and I am sure I won't buy any sub-forums anymore gonk We have over around 15!I singed that petition,i hope the mods see it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:49 pm
MemoryDragon The main problem is making sure that the gold goes toward the guild, instead of into the guild captain's pocket. This is what the old system insures, but due to the fact that we can really only use it for sub forums people are disgruntled. I'm not sure if I'd want the captains able to use those funds directly, but I do agree that the gold is really kind of pointless at the moment. sweatdrop Personally I wouldn't mind if the guild leader put it in his or her pocket. I mean, he/she did pay 20k just for the guild to exist, didn't he/she? Guild leaders deserve some monetary compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:51 pm
Actually, you are correct, it is the captain who basically owns a guild, but here, it would be different because the captain didn't buy the guild.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 7:56 pm
mamarita Actually, you are correct, it is the captain who basically owns a guild, but here, it would be different because the captain didn't buy the guild. hey..yea it is! eek rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:09 pm
Well, if you don't like the guild owner's intentions or if you don't trust him/her, you could always, y'know, not join or donate to the guild. eek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:55 am
mamarita Actually, you are correct, it is the captain who basically owns a guild, but here, it would be different because the captain didn't buy the guild.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
