|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:45 pm
|
|
|
|
www.conservapedia.org
It's the perfect example of "I don't entirely agree with what this says, and since I utterly cannot stand to be questioned about anything, I'll write the complete opposite and embrace it blindly."
A few choice articles:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexual_agenda
http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism (Which despite stale self-embarrassing arguments, isn't as bad as I had predicted.)
http://www.conservapedia.com/ACLU (Again, not outright as... utterly hilarious as the first, but it's clearly a lot of blind finger pointing. Not that I encourage the same right back, mind you.)
In parts, it does what it claims to do, in presenting a conservative viewpoint of politics and sociology. In others, it utterly begs its self to be clung to by the most ignorant minded in society.
Though, I would call that a problem unto its self. I can't say we don't have those just as awful about blind claims and generalizing insults amongst our own ranks as well. That's.. a discourse for another time, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 1:27 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:27 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:40 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|