|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:43 pm
Ok then, Hash.
With that logic, it can't be considered butchering a person unless I chop up and hammer away at and selling the remains of more than one person for meat to be eaten by other people.
But because you do it to the same person, it'd be like I did that to people who are all the same, so if I were a serial killer, it wouldn't be butchery, as per, it's only one type of person.
This can also relate back to slaves, as it was only non-whites that were slaves.
Also; Owwin- She's long gone out of the picture.
EDIT: Also, AK. I didn't even date her or kiss her.
Your insult is moot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:45 pm
Kuzodav Ok then, Hash. With that logic, it can't be considered butchering a person unless I chop up and hammer away at and selling the remains of more than one person for meat to be eaten by other people. But because you do it to the same person, it'd be like I did that to people who are all the same, so if I were a serial killer, it wouldn't be butchery, as per, it's only one type of person. This can also relate back to slaves, as it was only non-whites that were slaves. Also; Owwin- She's long gone out of the picture. Not at the History Channel that is where the past comes alive. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:47 pm
Owwin Kuzodav Ok then, Hash. With that logic, it can't be considered butchering a person unless I chop up and hammer away at and selling the remains of more than one person for meat to be eaten by other people. But because you do it to the same person, it'd be like I did that to people who are all the same, so if I were a serial killer, it wouldn't be butchery, as per, it's only one type of person. This can also relate back to slaves, as it was only non-whites that were slaves. Also; Owwin- She's long gone out of the picture. Not at the History Channel that is where the past comes alive. Nice image tacked on there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:48 pm
Teh AK Hashire. You like kiddy porn. Kuzo. You dated a 15 year old. Shut up. Wow. That may be a little inaccurate, but I still laughed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:48 pm
Hashire Kazemeijin I got what I wanted to say out there, I'm good.
And it's not "kiddy porn" because that would imply real people being viewed, and that's illegal and by that fact, not something I indulge in. You heard of Christopher Handley? I think it's absurd that they're trying to charge someone with owning something drawn at all, let alone going after something as vague as "obscene material", but it's still pretty relevant regarding real vs. fictional porn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:49 pm
My point is that you two have more in common that meets the eye.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:51 pm
Teh AK My point is that you two have more in common that meets the eye. Transform and roll out? xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:52 pm
Meta_Fish Teh AK Hashire. You like kiddy porn. Kuzo. You dated a 15 year old. Shut up. Wow. That may be a little inaccurate, but I still laughed. I saw you edit that. razz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:52 pm
Zephyrkitty Hashire Kazemeijin I got what I wanted to say out there, I'm good.
And it's not "kiddy porn" because that would imply real people being viewed, and that's illegal and by that fact, not something I indulge in. You heard of Christopher Handley? I think it's absurd that they're trying to charge someone with owning something drawn at all, let alone going after something as vague as "obscene material", but it's still pretty relevant regarding real vs. fictional porn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:53 pm
Teh AK My point is that you two have more in common that meets the eye. What does that have to do with leaving o's out of 'you'? You act like we hate eachother over this. I just hate the 'you's without o's. And it's not like I go exclusively for younger girls. Example: I've dated at least 3 girls older than me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:57 pm
Kuzodav Teh AK My point is that you two have more in common that meets the eye. What does that have to do with leaving o's out of 'you'? You act like we hate eachother over this. I just hate the 'you's without o's. And it's not like I go exclusively for younger girls. Example: I've dated at least 3 girls older than me. I can see through your lies Deceptacon scum! xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:59 pm
Owwin Kuzodav Teh AK My point is that you two have more in common that meets the eye. What does that have to do with leaving o's out of 'you'? You act like we hate eachother over this. I just hate the 'you's without o's. And it's not like I go exclusively for younger girls. Example: I've dated at least 3 girls older than me. I can see through your lies Deceptacon scum! xd Plz, I'm ttly an autobot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:01 pm
Kuzodav Teh AK My point is that you two have more in common that meets the eye. What does that have to do with leaving o's out of 'you'? You act like we hate eachother over this. I just hate the 'you's without o's. And it's not like I go exclusively for younger girls. Example: I've dated at least 3 girls older than me. *sigh* Listen. I was just making a joke. I figured you'd be cool about it instead of getting all defensive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:07 pm
I'm just not in the best of moods.
I apologize.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
