|
|
|
|
|
Platinum_Behemoth252 Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 10:46 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:50 pm
|
|
|
|
Platinum_Behemoth252 Phanari Platinum_Behemoth252 Not a bad description. I like it...plain simple and blunt yet showing much depth using very little wording. Yeah. That's really the only time Ellan was ever plain and simple in her books. The woman is brilliant, but she writes more than Jane Austin to describe things. or more than Rober Jordan? the man that can describe a chair for 6 chapters? And Chub? i say what you posted about dumbshits in Dakota....i jst had no real clue what you were talking about and i could think of nothing to post on it...im not ignoring you babe...why would i ignore one of the beautiful ladies at this guild?
Chubby, hun, if you should join the conversation. Then you won't feel so ignored.
And yeah, I know about those kinds of authors. They bug me. All but Shakey. He's too wonderful.
Gaston Leroux! The author of the original Phantom of the Opera book........FRAK! That man wrote a whole chapter about how Mdm Giry gets the salary to the Phantom and it took him 70 pages! "The Singular Importance of a Safety Pin" is the chapter. And then he has to continue it a few chapters later to add on to what he missed. "The Saftey Pin.....Again" Yes, those are the titles. As much as I loved that novel, Kay's is by far more entertaining. However, it doesn't have that wonderful line in it: "The grasshopper! Beware of the grasshopper! For it not only spins but it JUMPS! And it jumps JOLLY high!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 7:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:36 pm
|
Platinum_Behemoth252 Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 4:30 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 19, 2006 7:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2006 7:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 3:41 pm
|
|
|
|
chubby_choco ZerimarObon chubby_choco stressed I HATE HAVING TO HIDE MY RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU-KNOW-WHO!!!!! VOLDEMORT!!!! SHE'S SHACKIN UP WITH VOLDEMORT!!! RUUUUUUNNNNN!!!!! sweatdrop I think not. He ugly. ...maybe I'd shack up with Draco, though...or the Weasly twins...
Or Snape. Or Lucious. Prrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 3:47 pm
|
|
|
|
Phanari chubby_choco ZerimarObon chubby_choco stressed I HATE HAVING TO HIDE MY RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU-KNOW-WHO!!!!! VOLDEMORT!!!! SHE'S SHACKIN UP WITH VOLDEMORT!!! RUUUUUUNNNNN!!!!! sweatdrop I think not. He ugly. ...maybe I'd shack up with Draco, though...or the Weasly twins... Or Snape. Or Lucious. Prrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.....
I think Snape doesn't look that attractive, a little too pasty a complexion, perhaps a wee bit pessimistic, cruel, ect. Then again, it could be I'm just not into guys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2006 3:53 pm
|
|
|
|
ZerimarObon Phanari chubby_choco ZerimarObon chubby_choco stressed I HATE HAVING TO HIDE MY RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU-KNOW-WHO!!!!! VOLDEMORT!!!! SHE'S SHACKIN UP WITH VOLDEMORT!!! RUUUUUUNNNNN!!!!! sweatdrop I think not. He ugly. ...maybe I'd shack up with Draco, though...or the Weasly twins... Or Snape. Or Lucious. Prrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..... I think Snape doesn't look that attractive, a little too pasty a complexion, perhaps a wee bit pessimistic, cruel, ect. Then again, it could be I'm just not into guys.
I'd go with option B. I'm a girl, I think he's HOTT!!!! The pasty, greesed-over look works for him.
Also, Snape and Dumbledoor are the only characters in the movies who wear traditional wiccan robes. Kinda weird. Well.....Snapes is completely traditional. With Albus, it's just the cut.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Platinum_Behemoth252 Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:33 am
|
|
|
|
Phanari ZerimarObon Phanari chubby_choco ZerimarObon chubby_choco stressed I HATE HAVING TO HIDE MY RELATIONSHIP WITH YOU-KNOW-WHO!!!!! VOLDEMORT!!!! SHE'S SHACKIN UP WITH VOLDEMORT!!! RUUUUUUNNNNN!!!!! sweatdrop I think not. He ugly. ...maybe I'd shack up with Draco, though...or the Weasly twins... Or Snape. Or Lucious. Prrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..... I think Snape doesn't look that attractive, a little too pasty a complexion, perhaps a wee bit pessimistic, cruel, ect. Then again, it could be I'm just not into guys. I'd go with option B. I'm a girl, I think he's HOTT!!!! The pasty, greesed-over look works for him. Also, Snape and Dumbledoor are the only characters in the movies who wear traditional wiccan robes. Kinda weird. Well.....Snapes is completely traditional. With Albus, it's just the cut. yea i know i would nvr think ppl would find him attractive but apperantly there are a good bit that do. its jst one of those looks. some can pull it off alot cant...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|