|
|
Which dream vacation would you choose? |
Bahamas |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Tokyo, Japan |
|
60% |
[ 3 ] |
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Paris, France |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Sydney, Australia |
|
20% |
[ 1 ] |
Hawaii, USA |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
London, England |
|
20% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 5 |
|
|
|
|
ChainsawDooM Vice Captain
Dangerous Conversationalist
|
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:10 pm
|
|
|
|
A lot of this stuff I knew from a very young age, because I was a total space buff... the book just helps me explain it quickly in writing.
I will admit I didn't know the stuff about a black hole's gravity well, but I already knew about the 3 possible types of universes since I was like... 6 or 7. Amazing what you can learn from reading every scrap of paper or book you come across. I think that stuff was from some kind of promotion through the mail for some kind of science journal... little preview things. I kept them... probably still have them in a box somewhere... I should probably throw them away. I can still remember a lot of the pictures, too. I studied the little things a lot, since they were the most accurate space things I had... memorized all sorts of stuff about pulsars, neutron stars, nebulae, dwarf stars, black holes, wormholes, time travel theories... heh... I was exposed to Einstein's theory of relativity when I was 7... those were nice little papers...
I wonder what career I should try to go into. I have so many knacks for so many different things... Sometimes I wish my skill sets weren't so damned general. I know so much crap about everything but so little about each thing specifically... it really kind of blows...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChainsawDooM Vice Captain
Dangerous Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 8:33 pm
|
|
|
|
That's really something. Thanks for the graphic. It does literally help me see what you're saying. You know, it'd be a shame not to share all that knowledge, at least for a while, perhaps... maybe you'd enjoy being a teacher, or more specifically with you level, a professor. At least to give yourself some time to dabble in different fields that interest you until you narrow down something specific that you enjoy and can make a living doing. Plus, all you need is a degree in anything to become a teacher. Your enthusiasm would be like magic in a classroom! And you know there's a need for good teachers. Anyway, you know more than what would be considered common knowledge, in my opinion, for whatever it's worth.
That's cool that you had access and interest in all that information, especially at such a young age. Hmm... I recently had a subscription to Astrology magazine. The pictures were amazing, but alot of what they discussed was stuff I knew almost nothing about. I mean, I'm not totally clueless when it comes to our solar system. I found it interesting about the inner planets being terrestrial and the outer ones are gas; I love the elliptical orbits, solar winds, and the gravitational pulls. Did you hear about the study done that accurately could predict earth quakes by noticing weak areas in the crust that were closest to the moon when the moon's at its closest to the Earth. I thought that was pretty cool. But I can see that I only know a fraction of what there is to learn about, at least today's theories, like you said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChainsawDooM Vice Captain
Dangerous Conversationalist
|
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 12:00 am
|
|
|
|
... Not if it's fluorescent, no. If it's fluorescent, it just scatters certain wavelengths of light, specifically high blue, purple, and low ultraviolet light, making it looks like it's glowing. It's just... a modifier to the color to call it fluorescent... It just means that it's going to be really, really f***ing pink.
Remember, highlighters are fluorescent, and we all know they aren't radioactive. Just because something can glow doesn't make it radioactive. In fact... it usually isn't... that's just one of those movie myth things. Yes, you can make some stuff glow because it's radioactive... but that's kinda hard, and there are a lot of chemical reactions you can use instead that are so much easier, and safer.
If you really care, you could double check me in wikipedia, but I don't think I'm too far off.
Remember, Fluorescent means it kinda glows when exposed to certain light. Luminescent means it glows by itself, even in zero light.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:31 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 11:37 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2009 6:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChainsawDooM Vice Captain
Dangerous Conversationalist
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:46 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:31 pm
|
ChainsawDooM Vice Captain
Dangerous Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChainsawDooM Vice Captain
Dangerous Conversationalist
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 6:40 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:23 pm
|
ChainsawDooM Vice Captain
Dangerous Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:04 am
|
|
|
|
Well, I kinda watched that show, but I was distracted most of the time. But what I kept hearing repeated was that Dec 21st, 2012, from our perspective, our sun will be lined up with the center of our galaxy, and that the most advanced cultures such as the Mayans and Egyptians and people such as Nostradamus had all this mapped out, like the end of a cycle of destruction. But it sounded like a bunch of speculating and pointing our similar predictions, SO they don't know anything.
*insert* This is the description of the show: "There are prophecies and oracles from around the world that all seem to point to December 21, 2012 as doomsday. The ancient Mayan Calendar, the medieval predictions of Merlin, the Book of Revelation and the Chinese oracle of the I Ching all point to this specific date as the end of civilization. A new technology called "The Web-Bot Project" makes massive scans of the internet as a means of forecasting the future... and has turned up the same dreaded date: 2012. Skeptics point to a long history of "Failed Doomsdays", but many oracles of doom throughout history have a disturbingly accurate track record. As the year 2012 ticks ever closer we'll speculate if there are any reasons to believe these doomsayers." It comes on again this Sunday. Here's a clip: http://www.history.com/video.do?name=armageddon&bcpid=3887230001&bclid=5983807001&bctid=6085856001 Plus there's plenty more: http://www.history.com/content/armageddon/
That's pretty d@mn impressive that your computer recognized the difference between the "there's!" How'd it do that!? Do you pronounce them slightly different? That's crazy! That reminds me, did you see the fembot? http://www.gaiaonline.com/guilds/viewtopic.php?t=14276883 Lots of positive possibilities for that one! I hope he gets funded. It would be interesting to see all the different types of specialized robots programmers could think of to create. I guess that would leave open some undesirable ideas, too, but it would be a step towards that picture that we have of the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|