|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 2:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 2:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 2:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 2:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 3:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 3:30 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 3:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 3:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 3:57 pm
|
|
|
|
Omigod. whee I wasn't expecting that.
Hmm...there's a 'LOTR books suck' topic on 4chan...
I like what this guy has to say.
Quote: The issues with pacing and characterization come from two things. One is that, as noted, Tolkien wrote a good bit, but was more of an academic than a "writer". The other thing to realize is that it's rather awkward to compare the pacing/characterization/etc of LotR (or The Silmarillion) to standard novels--especially modern novels where the current ideal is to lean towards clipped, sparse, fast-paced writing--because Tolkien wasn't writing a "novel", he was creating a mythology for his beloved country of England in the tradition of old epics like Beowulf or the Norse Eddas. The characters are supposed to be heroic, mythic icons. Given the way most characters in older epics and sagas are portrayed, Tolkien's characters show quite a bit of humanity and complexity. But yes, ultimately, it's a story about Good vs. Evil in an iconic as well as personal way. Also, the setting of Middle-Earth was pretty much a character in and of itself, which is a big reason why there's so much description of places as they travel, even when it doesn't connect to the main plot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 4:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 4:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 4:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 4:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 4:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 5:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|