|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:38 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:40 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:58 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:50 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 10:05 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 10:26 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 10:44 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:10 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:27 am
|
|
|
|
Electric Kool-Aid *is both a pacifist and conscientious objector* It's a good idea, but we really have a lot of trouble just getting people to put the [A] at the beginning of their posts. If you have a (nonviolent) solution to making people read the 101, lemme know. 3nodding
I guess a non-violent approach would be to ask them to read the RP 101 thread and try to post in accordance with it. Really the only way to make them do something is to restrict them in some way from what they want to do. Hence, if they are unwilling to put effort into your RP, you ask a mod to remove their posts or you enter a special post where they are written out of the story until they feel like putting some effort into things.
I can understand and appreciate that you want to include everyone and make everyone happy and all, but it's quite impossible. However, you should look at both sides of the story. They happily post 3 sentences with little content other than the bare necessities, while others like 3 paragraphs detailing actions, feelings, contributions to the plot, etc.
I don't really believe there is a non-forceful way to have people put effort into things, because they do not believe they are not putting enough effort into things. And forgive me for the following statement. Having a non-interference policy like you suggest is at the heart of that assumption ( gonk *gets banned for heinous crimes against mod-hood*) It's true, however. The first step to making people advance is to tell them they're falling behind. That in itself is rather annoying as well.
On the [A] thing... deletion of unmarked threads 3nodding They won't do it more than twice. domokun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:06 pm
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:57 pm
|
|
|
|
*is snowed in*
*watches Sui's shameless plug with amusement* *gluggles Sui*
As do I, Gale. Anyway, low-level roleplays are necessary for those that do not wish to pout as much effort into roleplaying.
@Verush How can violence happen through the internet? We should just bear with n00bs, hoping that they'll gorw up and assisting them should they come to see the light.
Usually requiring longer posts and better quality will scare off n00bs. Those that still persist will have their profile rejected until changed ot meet the roleplay's given standards (usually resulting in the n00b just giving up).
We as a guild have no right to impose literacy ratings upon the roleplays within. Besides the fact that it is very time-consuming and tedious, who are we to judge a matter based solely upon opion and past experience? People will do what they will, and we should let them continue. The moment we include literacy ratings is the moment we cease being a truly free community.
Demand effort. How are we to know if somebody is putting their all into a 3-liner? Or maybe they're hardly trying and coming up with 3 paragraphs. Effort alone wouldn't do. This guild will remain free for roleplay creatrors to do as they wish (provided they follow Gaia and RPR rules). Placing so many standards would hinder creativity and discourage potential newcomers from joining our guild.
So you mean to say that you would kick a newbie out of your roleplay just because they're trying to get a handle on roleplaying better than they are used to? To me, that borders on being mean.
Blatanly poitning out another's shortcomings is usually considered rude. A match of name-calling and hurt feelings never gets anybody anywhere.
Having a policy of non-interference is what keeps our guild free. Think of the staff og this guild as the government of a nation. Historically, the more the government pries into the lives of its citizens and placed stricter boundaries upon them, the more discontented the people are. Such, they will move to other countires that are nicer.
We aren't so petty as to ban somebody for diagreeing with a mod. You're entitled to your opinion.
Deleting unmarked topics? We always warn them. Heck, I frogot to do it once way back when I first began in the guild. Are you not familiar with netiquette? We should let their roleplay die through locking it if they don't correct it. That way they can harvest the information they pisted and save it. Additionally, what would the time limit be for deletion of unmarked topics? What if somebody didn't get on for a while and found that their roleplay hed vanished because they weren't online within the specified time?
I don't mean to have been rude with any of my above statements or counter-agruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|