|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galad Aglaron Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 12:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:06 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:10 am
|
|
|
|
Clutzy_Ditz This is a puzzling subject, and very interesting. I am a Christian also, but I am one who believes Christ taught peace, turning the other cheek, and letting God get revenge. So, would the New Testament God guide a bloody war through a child? Puzzling. On the one hand I think (I'm not sure) I might blow someone out of my house with a rifle if he were a fatal threat to my family or myself. Would that be right? I really don't know. The Hundred Years' War seemed to be mostly about English threat of dominance over France. Basically, English rulers were coming into the "house" and threatening the freedom of the French, but did they threaten lives? Was this enough to war over? I don't know, because I don't know how threatening it was. I guess what I'm saying is, I don't know enough about the actions of England against France, to have a firm opinion on whether God would lead a child into battle against them. Does God lead children into battle? This is a large question. I believe in Divine Intervention. I also know people hallucinate. I think it's incredible that Jean d'Arc had so much faith in her "calling" that she did what most modern people could not. She became a soldier who wielded a sword on a horse, wearing heavy armor. That is a great accomplishment in itself. And, she, as a girl child, inspired hardened soldiers to believe in her cause, which is beyond amazing. But, I can't help but feel, if God had called someone for the job, it wouldn't have been a child. Jesus was and is very protective over children. Sorry to blab on, but I also feel that children are much more open to the spiritual world than adults are. Maybe God had to use a child, because the faith and 'sight' of children is much stronger. I think I could debate this all day. But, the problem is, I'm debating with myself. gonk wink Perhaps this was the fastest way to end the war? If Joan hadn't stepped in, how much longer would it have been before the war ended? It might have been the two-hundred-years' war.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 8:08 am
|
|
|
|
Fresnel Clutzy_Ditz This is a puzzling subject, and very interesting. I am a Christian also, but I am one who believes Christ taught peace, turning the other cheek, and letting God get revenge. So, would the New Testament God guide a bloody war through a child? Puzzling. On the one hand I think (I'm not sure) I might blow someone out of my house with a rifle if he were a fatal threat to my family or myself. Would that be right? I really don't know. The Hundred Years' War seemed to be mostly about English threat of dominance over France. Basically, English rulers were coming into the "house" and threatening the freedom of the French, but did they threaten lives? Was this enough to war over? I don't know, because I don't know how threatening it was. I guess what I'm saying is, I don't know enough about the actions of England against France, to have a firm opinion on whether God would lead a child into battle against them. Does God lead children into battle? This is a large question. I believe in Divine Intervention. I also know people hallucinate. I think it's incredible that Jean d'Arc had so much faith in her "calling" that she did what most modern people could not. She became a soldier who wielded a sword on a horse, wearing heavy armor. That is a great accomplishment in itself. And, she, as a girl child, inspired hardened soldiers to believe in her cause, which is beyond amazing. But, I can't help but feel, if God had called someone for the job, it wouldn't have been a child. Jesus was and is very protective over children. Sorry to blab on, but I also feel that children are much more open to the spiritual world than adults are. Maybe God had to use a child, because the faith and 'sight' of children is much stronger. I think I could debate this all day. But, the problem is, I'm debating with myself. gonk wink Perhaps this was the fastest way to end the war? If Joan hadn't stepped in, how much longer would it have been before the war ended? It might have been the two-hundred-years' war.
Good point. I must say, this is a confusing subject for me, because I've had a "war" within me, for years, concerning the centuries of bloodshed in the name of God. Even the Old Testament was bloody with wars. It seems that every "God" has worshipers who believe in murdering the "unbelievers". This debate is a continuation of a debate that has existed all throughout history. I have no clue as to it's answer. I am going to show my weak spine by saying "I have no set opinion on the matter".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:18 pm
|
|
|
|
Clutzy_Ditz Fresnel Clutzy_Ditz This is a puzzling subject, and very interesting. I am a Christian also, but I am one who believes Christ taught peace, turning the other cheek, and letting God get revenge. So, would the New Testament God guide a bloody war through a child? Puzzling. On the one hand I think (I'm not sure) I might blow someone out of my house with a rifle if he were a fatal threat to my family or myself. Would that be right? I really don't know. The Hundred Years' War seemed to be mostly about English threat of dominance over France. Basically, English rulers were coming into the "house" and threatening the freedom of the French, but did they threaten lives? Was this enough to war over? I don't know, because I don't know how threatening it was. I guess what I'm saying is, I don't know enough about the actions of England against France, to have a firm opinion on whether God would lead a child into battle against them. Does God lead children into battle? This is a large question. I believe in Divine Intervention. I also know people hallucinate. I think it's incredible that Jean d'Arc had so much faith in her "calling" that she did what most modern people could not. She became a soldier who wielded a sword on a horse, wearing heavy armor. That is a great accomplishment in itself. And, she, as a girl child, inspired hardened soldiers to believe in her cause, which is beyond amazing. But, I can't help but feel, if God had called someone for the job, it wouldn't have been a child. Jesus was and is very protective over children. Sorry to blab on, but I also feel that children are much more open to the spiritual world than adults are. Maybe God had to use a child, because the faith and 'sight' of children is much stronger. I think I could debate this all day. But, the problem is, I'm debating with myself. gonk wink Perhaps this was the fastest way to end the war? If Joan hadn't stepped in, how much longer would it have been before the war ended? It might have been the two-hundred-years' war. Good point. I must say, this is a confusing subject for me, because I've had a "war" within me, for years, concerning the centuries of bloodshed in the name of God. Even the Old Testament was bloody with wars. It seems that every "God" has worshipers who believe in murdering the "unbelievers". This debate is a continuation of a debate that has existed all throughout history. I have no clue as to it's answer. I am going to show my weak spine by saying "I have no set opinion on the matter". The problem is people's tendency to say "I'm right and you're wrong and to prove it, I'm going to put a gaping hole in your chest."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galad Aglaron Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:24 pm
|
|
|
|
Fresnel Galad Damodred Attrition? Hm. Yes. Attrition. I believe I can sing attrition, however, I do not wish to sing attrition. *is impersonating Dream of the Endless* That is something he'd say, isn't it? Morpheus, I mean, not Daniel. Dona nobis pacem, Dona nobis pacem, Donaaaaaa Nobiiiiiiiiiiiis Paaaacem!!!!!!!! Sacrosanctus Domine WHAP Pecavi ignoviunt WHAP Iuesus Christus Domine WHAP Pax vobiscum venerunt WHAP gonk Deprofundus clamo ad Te, Domine! Your Latin is TERRIBLE!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:41 pm
|
|
|
|
Galad Damodred Fresnel Galad Damodred Attrition? Hm. Yes. Attrition. I believe I can sing attrition, however, I do not wish to sing attrition. *is impersonating Dream of the Endless* That is something he'd say, isn't it? Morpheus, I mean, not Daniel. Dona nobis pacem, Dona nobis pacem, Donaaaaaa Nobiiiiiiiiiiiis Paaaacem!!!!!!!! Sacrosanctus Domine WHAP Pecavi ignoviunt WHAP Iuesus Christus Domine WHAP Pax vobiscum venerunt WHAP gonk Deprofundus clamo ad Te, Domine! Your Latin is TERRIBLE! My Latin is nonexistant. My Monty Python, however, is perfect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 6:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|