|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 2:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:25 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:17 am
|
|
|
|
Jimmy; cheers =)
LillianSaire; Personally I think the registry does a fair job of bringing people to guilds that they know they are looking for. It's also fairly easy for guilds that don't want to be found to stay out of searches. Inactive guilds, however you define that term, are generally not shown as prominently as more active ones. Active guilds are usually made to appear the more obvious choice (even if this is sometimes thanks to an ancient, secret algorithm...). There are fair mechanisms in place for all these things. I think we'd struggle to offer a more helpful alternative just by removing a lot of data that most people don't see anyway. Also, as a simple alternative to the registry, we would never be as convenient for as many people, and would bring with us new 'disadvantages' that the current registry 'fixes'.
NeoTsure; Agreed, there are definitely some advantages to starting small. It's easier to build something up than to rely on a sudden rush of exposure, no matter how much we might prepare for it.
I'd even put forward the idea of starting as a thread. Something loose and free-flowing, where people provide a few vital stats about guilds they are familiar with and discussion goes from there. If we can get some lively chat going we can look at taking the topic to a subforum where people can start their own 'guild discussion' threads.
By the way, with just one thread, the most appropriate forum for a resource like this would be the forum we call Resources & Discussion, which just happens to be the main forum. smile heart
What do you guys think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 7:11 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|