|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 9:53 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:47 pm
|
|
|
|
Mouse of Water BlueSpartan058 Dark_Spartan117 RenFlower Still, think of all the benefits and lives that would be saved. Isn't it worth it? and if it doesnt work, millions killed... and its not like stem cell research on embryos is the only way I agree with 117, plus humanity has survived without stem cell research for thousands of years, we could be fine without it. Yep!!! to top this subject off I was reading yesterday 'If your Pro-life and wrong, you at least thought you were saving lifes If your Pro-Choice and wrong, you slaughtered millions' So isn't it better to be Pro-life and wrong??? I'm pro choice and correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:08 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 6:34 pm
|
|
|
|
allypoohbear game100guy allypoohbear There are other ways to get these cells than by killing innocent children. You can get it from the umbilical chords as someone already said, or from the placenta after birth. The same stem cells found in aborted babies can also be found in these thing. So there is no reason to kill these poor children If that was true, why would they continue to do this? honestly...because it costs less money and it's easier to do. Oh....thankyou. But I'm pro choice, not that I'm like, "Kill that damn baby!!!!" I'm not sure about this stem cell research matter....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 12:41 am
|
|
|
|
game100guy Mouse of Water BlueSpartan058 Dark_Spartan117 RenFlower Still, think of all the benefits and lives that would be saved. Isn't it worth it? and if it doesnt work, millions killed... and its not like stem cell research on embryos is the only way I agree with 117, plus humanity has survived without stem cell research for thousands of years, we could be fine without it. Yep!!! to top this subject off I was reading yesterday 'If your Pro-life and wrong, you at least thought you were saving lifes If your Pro-Choice and wrong, you slaughtered millions' So isn't it better to be Pro-life and wrong??? I'm pro choice and correct.
So can you come up with an absolute argument then that rules out any chance that you could be slightly (or in my opinion all) wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 8:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:12 am
|
|
|
|
Zeptan allypoohbear game100guy allypoohbear There are other ways to get these cells than by killing innocent children. You can get it from the umbilical chords as someone already said, or from the placenta after birth. The same stem cells found in aborted babies can also be found in these thing. So there is no reason to kill these poor children If that was true, why would they continue to do this? honestly...because it costs less money and it's easier to do. Oh....thankyou. But I'm pro choice, not that I'm like, "Kill that damn baby!!!!" I'm not sure about this stem cell research matter....
Finally someone who admits a 'fetus' is equivalent to a 'baby' that's prochoice, although I completely disagree with him, and I understand you said you AREN'T like 'kill the d*** baby' ~!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:20 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|