|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:20 pm
Hashire Kazemeijin Like this:
Say it's just a normal 2v2. The votes tie up and it comes down to a roulette. If the roulette kills a wolf, then it would go down to 1v1 after the wolf kill, which would then be another roulette to determine the winner because vote kills happen before wolf kills.
But in this particular scenario J, the Mayor, was still alive with his double votes. Meaning even 2v2, town could have outvoted the Wolves, which would then lead to another 1v1 roulette unless the last wolf screwed up and didn't wolf kill J, which would then lead to town's assured victory. No I don't mean vote wise. Why would we leave it to a vote if we are even. If there are two werewolves and two people why let the people get another chance to vote? It's crunch time them. Or if it were the mafia instead, brain painting time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:22 pm
I'm going to count the first game, as a test, because a lot of things went wrong.
Feel free to join the new one. I've added some new roles for this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:22 pm
Owwin Hashire Kazemeijin Like this:
Say it's just a normal 2v2. The votes tie up and it comes down to a roulette. If the roulette kills a wolf, then it would go down to 1v1 after the wolf kill, which would then be another roulette to determine the winner because vote kills happen before wolf kills.
But in this particular scenario J, the Mayor, was still alive with his double votes. Meaning even 2v2, town could have outvoted the Wolves, which would then lead to another 1v1 roulette unless the last wolf screwed up and didn't wolf kill J, which would then lead to town's assured victory. No I don't mean vote wise. Why would we leave it to a vote if we are even. If there are two werewolves and two people why let the people get another chance to vote? It's crunch time them. I just believe if one side even has a slim chance at winning, they should be allowed to take it, if they're smart enough to see it.
That's just how I host my game though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:24 pm
Hashire Kazemeijin I just believe if one side even has a slim chance at winning, they should be allowed to take it, if they're smart enough to see it.
That's just how I host my game though. I was just going by the rules posted, if half of the remaining players are wolves, game over, not half the remaining votes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:36 pm
So, anyone else interested in joining the next one. I'll need at least 8 people to have all roles in the game.
Depending how fast people join, I'll either start the game at 12:00 tomorrow night (23:30 hours from now) or if people don't really join, I'll start it at 12:00 the day after (so about 47:00 hours)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 5:03 pm
I want to do the next game, where do I sign up for that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 5:05 pm
-Dessynea- I want to do the next game, where do I sign up for that? Right here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 5:07 pm
I figured that out right after posting but didn't care enough to delete the post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:41 pm
I'm signing up for the next game too kay thx bai.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:04 pm
I'd like to say something to everyone who voted for me:
The last couple pages were hilarious and I enjoyed reading how my rushed vote led to a huge confusion followed by my death. I love you guise. xD
Also, I'm so in for the next game. Wish I was here to change my vote before, the whole not being able to vote 'no lynch' really sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:19 pm
Actually, that'd be a useful feature for next game. The "no lynch" vote can actually out weigh votes to lynch someone.
Useful, yes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:10 am
I agree. No Lynch enabled plz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:11 am
Lady Psycho Sexy I agree. No Lynch enabled plz.
Does that mean you are coming back for another round?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:16 am
Duh. Not a round will pass without me. rolleyes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:30 am
Okay, that's 5 people joined at the moment.
I'll put the "No Lynch" feature in then. Does this sound right:
"You also have the option, to choose "No Lynch" (in bold). This means that if there are more "No Lynch" votes, then there are normal votes on a person, no one will be lynched that day."
It's on the first page now too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|