|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:00 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:15 am
|
|
|
|
I'm with Pilot to some extent. When we were asked what features we most wanted, I think we generally focussed on admin and crew features that would speed up day-to-day tasks. So from that point of view, it's disappointing to see Gaia approach the GGN overhaul from the opposite side, with cosmetic changes first off the block designed to boost traffic to guilds - in other words, a change in favour of everyone who didn't give any feedback on guilds because they aren't here yet.
The message here is that users care about what it seems like Gaia's priorities are, sometimes even more than they care about the actual changes that come.
But there is no getting around the fact that all of the GGN needs renewing (whether this is technically going to be a "rewrite" or just an update with occasional rewriting). And regardless of whether I think the new GGN splash page should have been one of the first things pushed out, it is definitely an important update.
Also, I can't imagine those splash pages being any better.
So, maybe not our ideal sequencing, but this isn't just about us. I'm sure our feedback is being internalised and used, and meanwhile, we have more than just promises of an update - we have the stunningly beautiful beginnings of one! That's exciting! heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:01 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:03 pm
|
|
|
|
Aereliya I understand the fact that the teams must run through several stages before releasing. Furthermore, I'm sure there is policies at which releasing is staged and implemented to avoid any issues on Gaia, in general. However, if we see no updates within this week many will question and I will not question. If this all falls through I will loose the last amount of trust in the words of Gaia's staff.
Please be assured these changes are happening. I, too, am anxious about the release and have been ready since the code was dev complete in January. However, I must reiterate the guilds code has been untouched for 3 years - the oldest code on the site - and it makes it difficult to patch/change. We have gone through 3 rounds of fixes so the final product will be of the highest quality. Additionally QA has decided to do a beta test over the weekend with the search so that puts us out til next week.
My goal in reaching out to this guild was not to frustrate, but to let you know about the changes that are coming, and gather feedback. When I first reached out, it looked like we would release within a couple weeks, but we had a backlog in QA and another project took pole position.
The devs and QA on this project have worked hard to get this project done, as well as the guilds landing page (next release). The fact that we are at the mercy of the code and QA schedule/process makes it less predictable as to when we will release, but its not because the code/ features are not done.
I ask to keep your faith and trust. I wouldn't put my words out there if I wasn't 100% confident these changes were happening.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:20 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 2:30 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:00 am
|
|
|
|
Pilotslover *goes back to her arduous task of PMing members with a 0 post count* Awesome, well be sure to let us know how the beta-testing goes. How are the beta-testers chosen btw? You make it sound like a focus group. How were they chosen? I'm just curious. PL Not sure how they are chosen. Will see what I can find out!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:48 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|