|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:53 pm
i think that the chicken layed an egg across the road.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 1:57 pm
thers no other way the chicken had to be born from the egg!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2007 3:58 pm
Doozanopia The Egg came first. It was laid by a chicken-like animal. The Chicken inside the egg was a slight mutation, a slightly more evolved chicken. This is the only logical explanation.
Egg for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:05 am
i say the chicken....but the question is...what came before the chicken?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 2:59 am
marshjazz Christians believe that all the animals just magically appeared in a flash of light, all of them at the same time. That was what day 4 or 5 or something? I could have been more respectful, but it gets tiring. Besides, it's not like they're coming back. Anytime your in a debate you get a stedy flow of people who come in and post nonsense and you never see them again. This isn't really something that should have a diffinitive answer. It is everyone's opinion, but if your going to have an opinion it should be logical. No, it wasn't a flash of light all at the same time. Didn't I say I was christian? Yes. Wouldn't that mean I know more about christianity? Yes. And are you saying it's not logical? Christians beleive god created the world through out seven days. I'm not quite sure how, I never studied it, I do know it wasn't a flash of light. So at the christian point of view, it's chicken. At the scientific point of view...nobody's really sure. At the joke point of view, it's egg. The only two that are positive are religion and joke. I just realized....Science doesn't solve everything! Although I will forever love the subject in school... Nobody will ever know for sure what came first. Like I said in an earlier post: Nobody lived when the chicken was created.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:25 am
You being Christian doesn't make you know more about it than those who aren't. Thats like saying that someone who believes in Santa knows more about him than those who don't. Yes, I'm saying that it isn't logical to me, but that is completely beside the point. In the bible, the first chapter(Book) of it it describes the beginning of the world. How god made the heavens and the earth and put humans there. On one day it says something like -and god greated all the animals...- That somehow all the animals just poofed on the earth. The flash of light was me being metaphorical for the fact that they just appeared there according to the bible.
Also, just because you don't agree with the egg coming first doesn't make it a joke. Did you even read my explaination or anything in this thread. Science does lean towards the egg coming first. Although there is a scenario that the chicken came first, but it is much less likely, since it is more likely that the chicken is nothing more than a mutated form of a dinosour.
Actually science does solve everything...eventually and all religion does is stand in the way of that progress.
I agree that no one will ever know for sure, unless we create a time machine. However, this is one of those to each his own. It is a philoshopical debate as much as it is a scientific one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 10:47 am
Sorry if I sounded like a b***h...but did you study christianity? I've learned all about this since I understood words.
And although science leans towards the egg, it still isn't completely sure.
Religion doesn't get in the way of science. I can't see how.
And science can't solve everything. We will never know exactly how the world was made, nor the first living creature. There are so many things in the world that science can't solve. All we have are stories.
Again, sorry if I sound bitchy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:17 am
Religion only stands in the way of science. Back when we still thought the sun revolved around the earth there were men, named Galileo and Copernicous who thought otherwise. Copernicous, without proof and a Roman in the times of Christianity only wrote his ideas down. Galileo, with proof didn't publish his works til after death, for fear of the Church killing him for proving them wrong or "questionng their authority." Had religion not been created people would have accepted this simple fact much faster and who knows how far into space exporitation we would have been. Religion slows science down. Just like with evolution and the big bang, I'm not saying that they are the ultimate truth, but maybe if their weren't so many devote creationists working to try and prove the bible we could find definitive proof.
I doesn't matter who studied what. You claiming to be an expert doesn't make you one.
Once again, when religion was created we had no idea how rain was made, religion explained it then now science does. Eventually science will explain everything. And once again, time travel may be possible, so we may be able to go back in time and wittness the world being created. That would be science explaining one more thing. And yes science can solve everything in this world, name me one thing, that in time, it will never ever be able to solve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:24 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:58 am
The Chicken. Anyone who is an evolutionist should agree with me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:44 pm
I guess it really depends on your beliefs. xD If you like the theory of evolution then I guess it is logical to believe the egg came first, if you are more religious then you may believe that God/a God created the chicken first.
I'm a Christian myself but I could really care less which one came first. I think I am with animegirl, eggs for breakfast and chicken for lunch. The end. xd
EDIT: Oh here's a response my bf just came up with. The chicken and the rooster came first. xD They are both needed to make the egg (well a fertilized egg that it).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:34 pm
Obviously the chicken came before the egg. My theory is that chickens weren't always able to lay eggs, but they evolved over time and became able to lay eggs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:37 pm
mellygirl562 The Chicken. Anyone who is an evolutionist should agree with me. I'm an evolutionist, and I agree with you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:48 am
I guess the chicken came first before
there were any eggs... 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:55 pm
@ marsh
I never claimed to be an expert, and I know I'm not one. I even question christianity sometimes.
In Galileo's case, it was fear that got in his way. The fear was the church, but that doesn't make it religion's fault.
Religion doesn't keep me from learning about science, nor does it to any of my friends who are religious. If anything, it pushes me to learn more about the world in a scientific way. I've even been able to make many connections between the bible and science.
Science will never solve everything. Science helps us discover things, but it can't solve it. We will never know the exact color of dinosaurs skin. You can't say science can solve everything, because you don't know what will happen in the future, but I shouldn't have said that it can't, because neither do I.
Let's just quit this argument. We're really going off subject. If I sound like a b***h, then I'm sorry. I don't like being on peoples bad sides.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
