|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:37 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:08 pm
|
|
|
|
Skibblez iv'e heard too many hoorror stories about it. a 27 year old lady got full body paralysis within an hour of taking the vaccine... NOT WORTH IT
Emphasis added.
DUDE! That's not even the worst part! I heard that while she was paralyzed, they took her kidneys and left her in a tub full of ice! Trust story! It happened to my co-worker's friend's girlfriend's sister-in-law's friend!
K, there is a BIG difference between hearing an isolated, apocryphal story vs. hard data analysis. There have been no studies showing a statistically significant rate of critical conditions developing among those who get the flu vaccine. If there was, the government wouldn't be pushing us to take it. Instead, they would be pushing us not to take it (and the tin foil hat crowd would be telling you to do everything you can to take the shot). If there were a statistically significant proportion of people developing debilitating conditions due to the shot, that means pushing people to take the shot promotes making more cripples. Cripples don't benefit the government. Cripples don't work, which means they make no income and so pay no income taxes. Instead, they collect social security disability, which means they cost us money. Cripples can't fight in the nations defense, which means promoting more of them depletes the manpower of the military. Do you honestly, for one second, think the government wants to lose money and make it harder for itself to fight wars?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|