Welcome to Gaia! ::

The Roleplay Refuge

Back to Guilds

A welcome and friendly place where many Role Plays are encouraged 

Tags: Role Playing, Community 

Reply Main Forum
The OOC Hangout Thread (New people introduce yourself here!) Goto Page: [] [<<] [<<] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4173 4174 4175 4176 4177 4178 ... 4221 4222 4223 4224 [>] [>>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Curiosity: How many still visit this place? Make a mark, and get some gold.
  I still exist!
View Results


Yoder


Invisible Phantom

10,775 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Tycoon 200
PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 7:20 pm
While i agree that the 4th estate of tradition media has strayed from its intended purpose due to money, I see the degeneration of the 5th estate into social media as not a sufficient substitute due to:
1. online disinhibition effect
2. bite-sized nature of things like twitter by nature leave out many important details
3. tendency of raging internet mobs to form, and the largely negative impact they have when real-life things cave to their demands
4. lack of adequate fact-checking w/ nobody held responsible for rumors/myths/lies (case in point, no substantiation for orlando shooter being gay, even though people assume it to be so since it was conjectured and can be framed pop-psychologically [and you and i both know that logical implication is only sufficiency and not necessity]).
5. bubble of social group defining the angle on which your news is skewed (can be warped even worse than traditional media).
6. social media, being contemporary and predominantly used by younger folks, is largely left-leaning since the education systems are left-leaning, and thus does not accurately represent demographics. even the pre-polling used by the US has proven wildly inaccurate this voting season, b/c they're not asking a true representative sample (which is hard to find, so then they should attempt to normalize for it or widen their error range).
7. social media can be blamed for the inverse of the internet dream (people w/ great idea collaborating, so people w/ bad ideas collaborating), in bringing left-regressive ideology to the mainstream (regardless of your political stance, knowing you for as long as i have, i am fairly certain you're just very liberal, not regressive).
etc...
[/rant]  
PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 10:15 pm
eek I seem to have hit a rather touchy spot. I'm sorry if I offended.

And I like to consider myself centrist with conservative leanings. That said, I fully admit that both Right and Left sides have good points, and both are full of crap. In the bygone eras where both sides would argue, then go get drunk together and hammer something out to compromise, our system seemed to work. Today it is all "take my votes and go home" unless the victory is absolute, leading to a deadlock that gets nothing done.  

Magni Prime
Captain

Eloquent Conversationalist

14,950 Points
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Foolhardy Benefactor 500
  • Supreme Supporter 500


Yoder


Invisible Phantom

10,775 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Tycoon 200
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 8:00 pm
I admit that I am passionate on this subject, but only b/c seeing society crumble around you when the solutions are so obvious is too frustrating at times.
You did not offend in any way; I just soap-boxed. sweatdrop

Given your misgivings toward organized religion and some other details you've shared over the years, I assumed you leaned left.
Yeah, I put 0 stock in career politicians, almost always preferring a candidate w/ another background if available. I doubt the concept was the intent of the founding fathers.  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:06 pm
Snowman, you are truly one of my oldest and dearest friends. I trust you can forgive me my caution. I do not wish to offend one that is held in the highest of regards. Passion is a good thing- but so is ensuring that the passion is for the subject, not against the participant.

I am of a faith that is miniscule in population in our country. My desires to protect animals large and small are often seen as quirky or nonsensical. My beliefs are so antiquated that people only remember two things- one, that it must revere their own devil, and two, that people were murdered en mass/on sight four hundred years ago for even the accusation. That has made me very cautious about discussing my beliefs around any not in my admittedly very small social circle. I've seen that in others as well. For instance, I went to RP, and noticed another man I had not previously met doing something with his dice, something I immediately recognized as energy play. When I asked using that title, he grew concerned until the man who invited me reassured this guy "he is one of us." Living with persecution and misgivings just on not believing in the same pantheon leaves me a tad bitter about faith.

Admittedly, I am also a crumudgeon. I'm a grump and point out how stupid people can be without a second thought. But no, I am not as much a libertarian as I am centrist. Conservative leanings include the idea of my life, my problem. Nobody should be able to remove my autonomy for the sake of a Big Brother government or ideal. Larger oversight is not what I desire. Mostly I am centrist because both right and left have good ideas that seep through the rhetoric, though often are drowned out by the fanaticism. I recall hearing a show talking about how in ages past, those on both sides would fight, then go out and drink, and while drunk hammer out a compromise. Now we no longer do that in our government. Instead it is an 'all or nothing' situation where even after the fact, the first priority is to undo the laws and progress made by the 'other side' as soon as they are in office.

Perhaps I am centrist because I can't stand the waist-deep manure of either side?

oh, and your comment made me think of this.
User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.
 

Magni Prime
Captain

Eloquent Conversationalist

14,950 Points
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Foolhardy Benefactor 500
  • Supreme Supporter 500


Yoder


Invisible Phantom

10,775 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Tycoon 200
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 9:25 pm
Your caution is understandable; but even if I was offended, I can take it. wink

Being of a religion with such a charged name has to be difficult, as names have a lot of associative power despite actuality.

I'm at the point where I barely care about the Left v Right issue anymore, as I simply want to avoid the Authoritarian end of the spectrum that both sides seem to have agreed upon (overlay the horseshoe onto the Nolan Chart to see what I'm talking about):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolan_Chart#/media/File:Standard_Nolan_chart.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory#/media/File razz olitical_spectrum_horseshoe_model.svg

I was a big fan of Ben Carson when he was still in the running (I come from a medical family, so there's personal bias there for sure), but anybody from a STEM field would bring a much-needed dose of reality to the table if they could get the nomination.  
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 9:58 pm
I am aware of a saying that has been floating around for some time. "Words have power, why else would we call it 'spelling?'" That speaks to my religious mindset, but I understand that such is merely a convenient homonym. Either way, it can be very isolating to have none of your faith nearby. I know of only one woman that displays any iconography, she has a massive tattoo across her chest. Turns out she only got it for her mother, who she is now at odds with, so yeah. Witches prefer to work in groups, in covens. Optimally, the group is composed of 13, and if too many more than that exist, evidently they break off to form a new coven. I am a group of one- so my practices are so far subdued that even I sometimes forget them. A support group like found in most churches would be wonderful . . . but compromising my faith just for a safety net is not acceptable.

As for people running, I still have some faith in Sanders, but don't have my hopes up for much happening. Lately, I've run fairly dry on things like hope.  

Magni Prime
Captain

Eloquent Conversationalist

14,950 Points
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Foolhardy Benefactor 500
  • Supreme Supporter 500

Saucy Goblin

Greedy Punk

PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 1:43 pm
Yo  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:53 pm
Though nowhere close to the isolation I'm sure you experience given your faith, finding Christians outside of the church environment is in New England.

I thought he had given up the race, no?



Hi, Chaos.  


Yoder


Invisible Phantom

10,775 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Tycoon 200

Magni Prime
Captain

Eloquent Conversationalist

14,950 Points
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Foolhardy Benefactor 500
  • Supreme Supporter 500
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 10:31 pm
Chaos Reclaimer
Yo


*gluggles the crap outta Chaos* HI!!!!

Sanders has publicly said he was going to fight until he was forced to quit. Furthermore, the media has downplayed every victory and hyped every defeat the man has had. Even when he was doing phenomenally well, he was asked "are you doing this to change Hillary's platform?" he responded by saying no, he wanted to win. Again, the next thing asked of him was "would you be Hillary's vice president?" he simply asked if Hillary would be willing to be his. Over and over, the tenacious old fart has held to his convictions, and stuck to the same platform he has been fighting in the name of for the last 40 years or more.

I'm confused. "Christians outside of the church environment is in New England"?  
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 2:41 pm
The media is just terrible with how biased they are on every front.
Though I find Sanders's platform unrealistic, I do recognize his anti-establishment stance and admire how well he has stayed consistent through his entire career; I don't know of any other politicians that can claim that.

That should have been "Christians outside of the church environment are rare in New England." Partly due to there not being many, and also b/c New England culture is generally less open.  


Yoder


Invisible Phantom

10,775 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Tycoon 200

Magni Prime
Captain

Eloquent Conversationalist

14,950 Points
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Foolhardy Benefactor 500
  • Supreme Supporter 500
PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2016 7:29 am
I will agree that Sanders may not have the most easily implemented platform. His ideas are radical and a fundamental change in American society. In my view, the catch to all that is how it is a needed change. America is not the greatest country in the world. In fact, for many people, it is a hard place to live. We need a fundamental shift in our society in order to allow us to reclaim our place among the greats. Not to destroy everything, but make it a place where our citizens can grow and be great. For the last 40 years we have had a society that was bought and sold as the ultimate extension of a capitalist financial ecosystem. We need things that Sanders is pushing for like a quality education system, healthcare for all people, and finding ways to support one another. We need to have living wages instead of starvation wages, and to find a way to let those who make absurd amounts of money on misery and oppression of their own workers realize that this is no longer acceptable. Sanders has pushed for those things to my understanding, and not only is his platform 'way out there,' nobody else is even approaching the subjects. One of the biggest selling points for me is as you mentioned . . . his stance has not changed in decades. No other politician I am aware of can even try to say that.

ahhh, that makes sense. I live on what I could call the border of New England, and all around me are churches that are of various aspects of Christ. Perhaps I am not deep in New England enough to see what you are referring to. Between the Amish and the prolific churches within driving distance of my home, I just cannot say that Christians are rare- in or out of a church environment.  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 5:30 pm
I want to get an rp started, particularly of the dnd 5e flavor. I believe there's a program that allows users to play a tabletop game over a chat-esque form. Roll20?  

Saucy Goblin

Greedy Punk



Yoder


Invisible Phantom

10,775 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Tycoon 200
PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2016 6:46 pm
While American may not be great anymore, I cannot think of a country with more freedom; I guess I'd say there is currently no greatest, as other nations claiming constitutional democracy have shown to only nominally support at least some part of that system.
While I agree that the education system needs significant reform (specifically to undo the education "reforms" of the last 40 years), I find the ideas of universal[ly mediocre] healthcare & forcing the minimum wage higher [than the economy can sustain] to be problematic. But we will probably never agree on this, as it seems you prefer socialism to capitalism; I'd prefer a return to before the past 40 years of corruption than a wholesale restructure.

Yeah, PA is basically part of the South to NE, though I know most in PA would object to that; however, culturally they are more similar to the South than to NE.

~

I've not had great experience w/ tabletopping over the net. We've usually had to drop the battle grid, but good luck.  
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:43 pm
I respectfully disagree again. American freedoms are a farce for approximately half. The reasons are diverse, ranging from 'security,' to racism, to 'political correctness.' The balancing act of security versus freedom has always been a difficult one to maintain. Unfortunately, we have a far bigger issue- we are not in a democracy. This is the (in my opinion) ultimate lie of our society. We do not get to choose our leaders. The popular vote is meaningless. What matters is the electoral college- a group that has no direct known link to the popular vote other than going with what they feel is best. even when the popular vote is for one candidate, meaning that person has the most votes of the American public, that candidate can easily still lose if he or she does not have the approval of the EC. Furthermore, if the EC fails, the task of naming the next president does not go to the public, it goes to the House of Representatives. Compounding this issue is that the politicians are predominantly purchased by the largest money-holders in our society. That means we are not in a democracy wherein the populace has power. We are in an oligarchy, a situation where a scant few hold all the power. The longer we reside in this system, the worse it becomes. We are at a breaking point, where very few can ignore the fact that the inequality of our society is unavoidable.

As for raising the minimum wage, it either must be raised to a point that serves the original purpose, or we throw it out altogether. The 'minimum wage' is the least amount a person can earn doing a full-time job to reach enough funds to live. I work full-time, and so does my wife. we each make more (on average) than minimum wage, and yet we still are below the poverty line. The wage is no longer livable. Most economists that I have heard as specialists on this situation all say the same thing: raise the minimum wage. The strongest piece of evidence is how low-income individuals spend all of their income, often and then some. Those that are rich now spend far, far less. Thus, putting more income in the hands of the poor and few middle-class individuals left will put more money into the economy and moving. Scrooge McDuck style wealth does no good sitting in a vault/money bin. The economy must breathe, move, flow. Instead, it has stagnated, bloated, and left those that actually keep the economy moving with a drip feed of funds instead of something to live off of. Meanwhile those that have the money keep getting more and not spending any more than absolutely necessary.

I put forth that undoing over 40 years of corruption will be as alien a structure as remaking the whole thing. A generation of workers all put this system into place, and undoing it will not be easy, simple, or fast. Supplanting the situation will not be easy, simple, or fast. If we know the vehicle is broken, why continue to use it?

Other countries on this planet have universal health care, and are vastly superior to our own. Not because of mediocrity, but because being ill or injured should not be a catastrophic ordeal to 85%-99% of the populace.

as for the issue of socialism, that is not entirely true. I recall a quote from online- "I don't want your money. I want a chance to make my own." Our system does not allow that freedom, and if you do not have a stack of funds to begin with, the likelihood to make one is dismal. At this point, we call it the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chaos:
I've never tabletopped through computer. I always have too much suspicion of the dice rolls, and just have to wonder about how the system could be cheated. The only RP I've done online has ever been pure text, as we once did as Charles and Contenmo.  

Magni Prime
Captain

Eloquent Conversationalist

14,950 Points
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Foolhardy Benefactor 500
  • Supreme Supporter 500

Magni Prime
Captain

Eloquent Conversationalist

14,950 Points
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Foolhardy Benefactor 500
  • Supreme Supporter 500
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:16 pm
poke  
Reply
Main Forum

Goto Page: [] [<<] [<<] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4173 4174 4175 4176 4177 4178 ... 4221 4222 4223 4224 [>] [>>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum