|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 12:48 pm
|
|
|
|
Longbow UK Zurgiea We really should edit that out of the rules ninja FALATHRIM SUCKS! Oh noez! I'm braking teh rulez! What Zurgiea said. xd gonk Tis a mutiny! xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 12:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 12:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 1:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 1:02 pm
|
|
|
|
Nienna of the Valar Longbow UK Zurgiea We really should edit that out of the rules ninja FALATHRIM SUCKS! Oh noez! I'm braking teh rulez! What Zurgiea said. xd gonk Tis a mutiny! xd Yeah, well Darth Christopher Vader Anakin Tolkien-Skywalker asked for it. xd
Falathrim Why were you disappointed in RotK? I don't know how to explain it really. Of all the three movies, I thought RotK was the worst for missing out important scenes. Also I was a bit disappointed with the Siege of Gondor and hated the way it was changed so the Oathbreakers just stormed the fields and citadel, winning the battle. neutral I can accept changes like the Elves at Helm's Deep as it was ideal for the target audience, but that... gonk Also I felt the RotK didn't flow as well as the other two movies. (hard to explain.) There are other reasons, but those are the ones that spring to mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 1:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 1:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 1:17 pm
|
|
|
|
Debate. Joy. smile
Scouring simply isn't possible. The Fall of Barad-dur is like the ultimate climax, and in the books we have several chapters between the Fall and the Scouring: The Steward and the King, The Field of Cormallen, Many Partings, and Homeward Bound. We have more than enough time to recover from the fall of Sauron, preparing us for the long expected Scouring.
The movies, however, gives us five-ten minutes between the Fall and the homecoming, and as it stands most people already feel as if it drags on too long. If we had set up a second conflict, one of a tremendously less importance, so soon after the Fall, and thus prolonging the ending for another 20-30 minutes, the movie-viewers would have been mutinous.
Keep in mind that PJ and crew didn't film things just for the EE. To film the Scouring just foor us loyal fans would not have been a wise move profit-wise.
Okay. Well then, moving on. They filmed the most footage for Return of the King. And they needed to condense it into a three hour film. The EE is 50 minutes longer that the TE. You can make a novel as long as you want, but nobody is going to watch a ten hour movie. Or, at least, not enough people for it to be in any way profitable. Of course some scens need to be skipped, and of course some parts are going to feel summarized. Honestly, that should have been expected before even going into the theater to watch Fellowship of the Ring.
The Dead was annoying, true, but the movies are directed to the general audience, not just us loyal fans. If you had never read LotR, how would you have reacted if Aragorn sailed up the Anduin without the army with him, after seeing him confront the king earlier? And even if they had come, but simpyl scared the Orcs away like they did the Corsairs in the books, how would the typical movie-viewer react?
I imagine it would be something like this: 'They scared the enemy away. That's ridiculous.' If you can accept the Elves at Helm's Deep due to target audience, then it's a bit odd that you won't accept any other changes for the audience. The Elves at Helm's Deep violates one of Tolkien's themes. The Dead being at the Battle of the Pellanor Fields does not.
Oh, and by the way... *makes all the mutinous people die a horrible painful death with his awesome Dark Side suffocation move*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 1:20 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 1:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 1:30 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 3:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2004 3:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|