|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:23 pm
J of The Wind Kuzodav J of The Wind teh_n00b_huntr ((ok back, unexpected RL thing to take care of popped up)) "Well players I guess I can tell you the cost of today's info, the player amongst you who the Reapers have chosen gets erased instantly, rather than giving him or her a few more hours of life. So what'll it be? Instant gratification or a bit more time with a friend." ....Kuzo, you still here? I think we should... ....Hrm. What's the prize? The hint is the prize, and the cost isnt as dire since were losing a player anyway... If that happens. The player won't get their vote in. Then it'll be tied, reapers 5 players 5. all of the reapers and their special units remain. We have a guardian, psychomancer, and vote-changer They have two harriers, a mole, a support, and a vote blocker. However, in the vote, only the vote-effecters matter. In 5 on 5, the Reapers would be at the advantage. Let's say we even get them down to voting between one of us and one of them. They know who they are. Their vote blocker can be used to block a vote against one of them. Conversely, we don't know who they are, so let's say our vote-changer decides to change a vote. Then they have 50% chance of picking the right person. But at the same time, we don't have that large of a chance for the votes to be at least one reaper, let alone two, or just none. But let's say we get the vote down to a reaper and a player. And each of the vote-effects are used effectivley. Then they'll cancel-out eachothers' vote-effectingness. So then the vote would be tied anyway. What would happen in the event of a tie, GM? EDIT: I'mma go shoer, brb asap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:24 pm
Orphie Okay, J's for it, I'm for it, who else is for it? I will say yes too. Having a hint and letting someone die is better than letting someone die without anything to go on after words.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:27 pm
Kuzodav What would happen in the event of a tie, GM?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:30 pm
Kuzodav J of The Wind Kuzodav J of The Wind teh_n00b_huntr ((ok back, unexpected RL thing to take care of popped up)) "Well players I guess I can tell you the cost of today's info, the player amongst you who the Reapers have chosen gets erased instantly, rather than giving him or her a few more hours of life. So what'll it be? Instant gratification or a bit more time with a friend." ....Kuzo, you still here? I think we should... ....Hrm. What's the prize? The hint is the prize, and the cost isnt as dire since were losing a player anyway... If that happens. The player won't get their vote in. Then it'll be tied, reapers 5 players 5. all of the reapers and their special units remain. We have a guardian, psychomancer, and vote-changer They have two harriers, a mole, a support, and a vote blocker. However, in the vote, only the vote-effecters matter. In 5 on 5, the Reapers would be at the advantage. Let's say we even get them down to voting between one of us and one of them. They know who they are. Their vote blocker can be used to block a vote against one of them. Conversely, we don't know who they are, so let's say our vote-changer decides to change a vote. Then they have 50% chance of picking the right person. But at the same time, we don't have that large of a chance for the votes to be at least one reaper, let alone two, or just none. But let's say we get the vote down to a reaper and a player. And each of the vote-effects are used effectivley. Then they'll cancel-out eachothers' vote-effectingness. So then the vote would be tied anyway. What would happen in the event of a tie, GM? EDIT: I'mma go shoer, brb asap. Your forgetting that rarely anyone is voting currently. If suddenly people get together and band their vote together, than THAT will be the pivotal thing for me. Lets say If Rawk was a reaper, and the vote came down to him or you, assuming your a player. If suddenly people like Kath or ZK banded together and voted for you, I would be curious because people who don't normally vote or are on the fence are suddenly active? Some things are easily spottable, and others seem too subtle... but I think this is the only thing we can do. No one seems too sure to vote today anyway, so...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:32 pm
Gah Brbin like a halfhour guys. Someone be ready to debrief me on events that have passed ok?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:33 pm
J of The Wind Kuzodav J of The Wind Kuzodav J of The Wind teh_n00b_huntr ((ok back, unexpected RL thing to take care of popped up)) "Well players I guess I can tell you the cost of today's info, the player amongst you who the Reapers have chosen gets erased instantly, rather than giving him or her a few more hours of life. So what'll it be? Instant gratification or a bit more time with a friend." ....Kuzo, you still here? I think we should... ....Hrm. What's the prize? The hint is the prize, and the cost isnt as dire since were losing a player anyway... If that happens. The player won't get their vote in. Then it'll be tied, reapers 5 players 5. all of the reapers and their special units remain. We have a guardian, psychomancer, and vote-changer They have two harriers, a mole, a support, and a vote blocker. However, in the vote, only the vote-effecters matter. In 5 on 5, the Reapers would be at the advantage. Let's say we even get them down to voting between one of us and one of them. They know who they are. Their vote blocker can be used to block a vote against one of them. Conversely, we don't know who they are, so let's say our vote-changer decides to change a vote. Then they have 50% chance of picking the right person. But at the same time, we don't have that large of a chance for the votes to be at least one reaper, let alone two, or just none. But let's say we get the vote down to a reaper and a player. And each of the vote-effects are used effectivley. Then they'll cancel-out eachothers' vote-effectingness. So then the vote would be tied anyway. What would happen in the event of a tie, GM? EDIT: I'mma go shoer, brb asap. Your forgetting that rarely anyone is voting currently. If suddenly people get together and band their vote together, than THAT will be the pivotal thing for me. Lets say If Rawk was a reaper, and the vote came down to him or you, assuming your a player. If suddenly people like Kath or ZK banded together and voted for you, I would be curious because people who don't normally vote or are on the fence are suddenly active? Some things are easily spottable, and others seem too subtle... but I think this is the only thing we can do. No one seems too sure to vote today anyway, so... Even if they banded together, we'd know they were reapers. But then they would out-vote us, anyway. And then they would have the majority. And then we would lose. Don't you see how pivitol this vote is? And any that follow after it? This is the moment. So we find out who the reapers are, if they band together. We'll still die. Knowing who they are does nothing after they've gained the majority.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:34 pm
J of The Wind Gah Brbin like a halfhour guys. Someone be ready to debrief me on events that have passed ok? Will try and if I'm not on Draco will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:41 pm
Kuzodav J of The Wind Kuzodav J of The Wind Kuzodav ....Hrm. What's the prize? The hint is the prize, and the cost isnt as dire since were losing a player anyway... If that happens. The player won't get their vote in. Then it'll be tied, reapers 5 players 5. all of the reapers and their special units remain. We have a guardian, psychomancer, and vote-changer They have two harriers, a mole, a support, and a vote blocker. However, in the vote, only the vote-effecters matter. In 5 on 5, the Reapers would be at the advantage. Let's say we even get them down to voting between one of us and one of them. They know who they are. Their vote blocker can be used to block a vote against one of them. Conversely, we don't know who they are, so let's say our vote-changer decides to change a vote. Then they have 50% chance of picking the right person. But at the same time, we don't have that large of a chance for the votes to be at least one reaper, let alone two, or just none. But let's say we get the vote down to a reaper and a player. And each of the vote-effects are used effectivley. Then they'll cancel-out eachothers' vote-effectingness. So then the vote would be tied anyway. What would happen in the event of a tie, GM? EDIT: I'mma go shoer, brb asap. Your forgetting that rarely anyone is voting currently. If suddenly people get together and band their vote together, than THAT will be the pivotal thing for me. Lets say If Rawk was a reaper, and the vote came down to him or you, assuming your a player. If suddenly people like Kath or ZK banded together and voted for you, I would be curious because people who don't normally vote or are on the fence are suddenly active? Some things are easily spottable, and others seem too subtle... but I think this is the only thing we can do. No one seems too sure to vote today anyway, so... Even if they banded together, we'd know they were reapers. But then they would out-vote us, anyway. And then they would have the majority. And then we would lose. Don't you see how pivitol this vote is? And any that follow after it? This is the moment. So we find out who the reapers are, if they band together. We'll still die. Knowing who they are does nothing after they've gained the majority. Meaning we have to cast a vote immediately so they get a chance now. Wich is why I say: Vote- Kath I know I know, I have no base, but seriously, its time for action dude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:43 pm
I don't support your vote. Anyway, for the sake of organization VOTES:
J: 1
Kuzo: 1
Kath: 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:45 pm
Ok, I need to go, too.
I'll check back in a few hours. Frienship Duty calls.
I didn't even get her a gift because I've been on here. XD
I voted for J, and I vote 'No.' to the GM's offer.
For the record. Jus sayin'.
Kthxbi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:46 pm
Kuzodav I don't support your vote. Anyway, for the sake of organization VOTES:
J: 1
Kuzo: 1
Kath: 1 Duly noted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:46 pm
I don't know if Huntr's decided to do it differently for this game, but in past games a tie was decided by RNG between the selected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:47 pm
You know, if we agree to the GM's thing, we might lose someone important. They may have used their sleuth to find out our important roles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 5:00 pm
((sorry was eating, but what Hash said is how it would come down to it.))
"How's about I make it even simpler, the two who would be put on the chopping block would be the reaper you seek and a player. Win or lose? Now is the time to ante up and go for broke."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 5:03 pm
teh_n00b_huntr ((sorry was eating, but what Hash said is how it would come down to it.)) "How's about I make it even simpler, the two who would be put on the chopping block would be the reaper you seek and a player. Win or lose? Now is the time to ante up and go for broke." I'm agreeing and asking for the names of the people to be put on the chopping block.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
