|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:38 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:14 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:38 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:27 pm
|
|
|
|
Allegro Lord of Armageddon It should be noted that I don't play Pokemon to "Catch 'Em All" because I know full well what reward you get for doing so...you spend hours upon hours of your life catching something around 500+ Mons and what do you get for completeing this rather large collection? A goddamn certificate that says "Congradulations" and a gold star on your Trainer Card. That's it. Why would I bother wasting my time trying to catch 'em all when I can just simply catch as only a selct few to make some good teams? I'm satisfied with just simply battling with my favorites, not catching every damn 'mon there is for some old prune that claims he's working on real science. Accomplishment does not have to be defined by a "Bleep Bloop" on your screen worth 10 achievement points or whatever. Why do you think people do baby only runs in pokemon? If you're satisfied by what you've done, there doesn't need to be huge fanfare. (I did an Ash run where I was only allowed to use pokemon he had in the first season.)
Define a "run" please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:28 pm
|
|
|
|
Allegro Lord of Armageddon It should be noted that I don't play Pokemon to "Catch 'Em All" because I know full well what reward you get for doing so...you spend hours upon hours of your life catching something around 500+ Mons and what do you get for completeing this rather large collection? A goddamn certificate that says "Congradulations" and a gold star on your Trainer Card. That's it. Why would I bother wasting my time trying to catch 'em all when I can just simply catch as only a selct few to make some good teams? I'm satisfied with just simply battling with my favorites, not catching every damn 'mon there is for some old prune that claims he's working on real science. Accomplishment does not have to be defined by a "Bleep Bloop" on your screen worth 10 achievement points or whatever. Why do you think people do baby only runs in pokemon? If you're satisfied by what you've done, there doesn't need to be huge fanfare. (I did an Ash run where I was only allowed to use pokemon he had in the first season.) People do hat makes them happy. For some people, that just happens to be fulfilling the goals set out for them, no matter how inconceivably ridiculous. I remember back in the day, when 150 seemed crazy. xd @J: A "run" in this case is a run-through of the game, playing it over again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:37 pm
|
|
|
|
Wantcookie Allegro Lord of Armageddon It should be noted that I don't play Pokemon to "Catch 'Em All" because I know full well what reward you get for doing so...you spend hours upon hours of your life catching something around 500+ Mons and what do you get for completeing this rather large collection? A goddamn certificate that says "Congradulations" and a gold star on your Trainer Card. That's it. Why would I bother wasting my time trying to catch 'em all when I can just simply catch as only a selct few to make some good teams? I'm satisfied with just simply battling with my favorites, not catching every damn 'mon there is for some old prune that claims he's working on real science. Accomplishment does not have to be defined by a "Bleep Bloop" on your screen worth 10 achievement points or whatever. Why do you think people do baby only runs in pokemon? If you're satisfied by what you've done, there doesn't need to be huge fanfare. (I did an Ash run where I was only allowed to use pokemon he had in the first season.) People do hat makes them happy. For some people, that just happens to be fulfilling the goals set out for them, no matter how inconceivably ridiculous. I remember back in the day, when 150 seemed crazy. xd @J: A "run" in this case is a run-through of the game, playing it over again. Runs are usually defined by a certain set of circumstances. For example, a speed run is the concept of beating a game as fast as possible. As normal run is to play the game without any modifiers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:11 pm
|
darkshiek ze spiffy ninja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:07 pm
|
|
|
|
Allegro Lord of Armageddon It should be noted that I don't play Pokemon to "Catch 'Em All" because I know full well what reward you get for doing so...you spend hours upon hours of your life catching something around 500+ Mons and what do you get for completeing this rather large collection? A goddamn certificate that says "Congradulations" and a gold star on your Trainer Card. That's it. Why would I bother wasting my time trying to catch 'em all when I can just simply catch as only a selct few to make some good teams? I'm satisfied with just simply battling with my favorites, not catching every damn 'mon there is for some old prune that claims he's working on real science. Accomplishment does not have to be defined by a "Bleep Bloop" on your screen worth 10 achievement points or whatever. Why do you think people do baby only runs in pokemon? If you're satisfied by what you've done, there doesn't need to be huge fanfare. (I did an Ash run where I was only allowed to use pokemon he had in the first season.) Even as an achievement whore I just want to collect them all so I can say I did. Not that I'll ever get all the event pokemon. D:
Also, I don't care about battling, which is why I collect them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|