I finally got my hands on a copy.
So far I understand his justification on attacking religion. In fact, he has several points on justifying it.
I'm in the part where he talks about Agnostics. I'm confused on his stance. I mean, it seems like he does not agree with the whole fence sitter idea, but at the time seems to promote it.
I think I'll end up rereading the chapter for better clarity. So far though, it's a good book.
I do have one major issue though. That book belongs in the Religion and Inspiration section of Barnes and Noble. On the back of the book it even has the little coding thing that tells that it belongs in that section.
However, it was placed in the Science section. The book is not about science, it is about religion. So why wasn't it in the section of "religion and inspiration?"
So far I understand his justification on attacking religion. In fact, he has several points on justifying it.
I'm in the part where he talks about Agnostics. I'm confused on his stance. I mean, it seems like he does not agree with the whole fence sitter idea, but at the time seems to promote it.
I think I'll end up rereading the chapter for better clarity. So far though, it's a good book.
I do have one major issue though. That book belongs in the Religion and Inspiration section of Barnes and Noble. On the back of the book it even has the little coding thing that tells that it belongs in that section.
However, it was placed in the Science section. The book is not about science, it is about religion. So why wasn't it in the section of "religion and inspiration?"