|
|
| Rpd or M240 |
| Rpd |
|
28% |
[ 2 ] |
| M240 |
|
71% |
[ 5 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 12:51 am
Both of these i didn't even know exist till i saw mw2 but they can kick some major a**!
The Rpd is not very accurate but has lots of firepower.Yet it has an extradordinary long reload.
The M240 eats bullets quicker is more accurate but has less damage.But it has a reload almost as long as the Rpd...
I think the M240 is better because of the great accuracy compared to the Rpd...
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:42 am
m240 is best if out numbered
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Committee Staff Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:27 pm
RPD with grip is just crazy. Ran 10 straight games 10kd running around with RPD w/grip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:39 am
i would rathe use the mg4 fmj with danger close because it has explosive rounds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:38 pm
Both of them have similar accuracy (meaning holding the trigger for extended periods = no accuracy whatsoever). the sights on both are good and have similar reloading times. the only noticable difference is the RPD seems to have a tiny bit more damage and recoil with a slightly slower rate of fire. pick whitch ever b/c both are great (and I recomend a grip with slight of hand to even out the accuracy and reloading issues)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
