|
|
Keep or toss? |
Keep them! |
|
33% |
[ 4 ] |
Toss 'em |
|
33% |
[ 4 ] |
Don't care! |
|
33% |
[ 4 ] |
|
Total Votes : 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 2:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 6:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 7:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 10:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:13 am
|
|
|
|
Basically it's just ... all about terminology. Re-reading the lore, it looks like the "subspecies" label was for Kitsu that had originally been normals and were somehow changed to whatever subspecies. For example.... "Once there was a terrible storm that swept across the beaches, leaving the land in ruin and disarray. As the local residents tried to clear out the wreckage, a strange new discovery was made. Lying under the fallen trees and nearly buried in the sand was a shimmering coral, as bright as sunlight. The human that discovered the item then handed it to his companion Kitsusagi, as he continued to help clear out the destroyed shoreline. When he returned, however, he was stunned to find his Kitsusagi swimming in the ocean and transformed, their bodies marked by scales and fins. Thus began the Mer Kitsusagi population."
But really, there's no need for a separation between just being a "species" of Kitsu and being a "subspecies" - no matter how the species was originally created.
So to take away some unnecessary terminology/separation,
The shop decision is to eliminate the term "subspecies" and have every type of Kitsu simply be labeled as a "Species" from here on out.
Thank you everyone for your input!
These changes will be reflected on the front page of the shop asap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|