|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 6:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 6:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 6:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 6:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 7:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 8:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 8:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 8:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 8:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 9:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 10:10 pm
|
|
|
|
TLHE Dante..Sparda Kiss in Digital I read it a few years ago because of Radiohead's song "Paranoid Android" and was EXTREMELY skeptical about the movie. But, given that Adams wrote most of the screenplay and the fact that it's an adaptation of a book that was an adaptation of radio plays I'm quite happy with the movie. I know he made the screenplay, but It wasn't that much like the original book. They tried too hard to make it into a suitable movie. Did you really EXPECT it to be just like the book? The story is never the same one through two incarnations. He did try hard to make it into a good movie, and I think he succeeded. However, my point is, the changes probably weren't just to make it into a good movie, they would have to be there for it to be truly Adams. I imagine they're just much more pronounced because he had 20 years to think on it. It was a good movie, and it did feel like a piece of DNA's art but somethings really bugged me. The Romance story between Arthur and Trillian was really not needed, and... that was about it. I do wish they would've used the guide more, explaining the whole thing with the towel(that was really needed),and did that bit about god with the Bablefish. I'm probably just disappointed that it wasn't funnier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 10:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 11:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 2:34 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|