|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 7:01 am
|
|
|
|
I will say it, and I will say it simply. I am a series fangirl. I love it. I simply cannot get enough of it, to the extent that I own a wand from Alivans, I have Quidditch goggles, am working on making Quidditch robes, and frequently sit in pubs with university friends heatedly debating the series over a pitcher of cheap beer.
While my fellow Honours students are working on very sophistocated topics for their thesis this year, including Jeckle and Hide, Frankenstein and other beloved classics, I have proven myself and dork and chosen to wet my feet in the academic pool with Harry Potter and Narnia). A children's series.
Or is it?
What is it about the series that makes it so ageless? It's as bound to captivate a 5 year old as it is a 55 year old. It contains all of the classic elements of fantasy literature, but it also carries all of the difficulties of growing up, which the characters actually do, rather than simply ageing or remaining timeless.
So how did the Potter bug first bite you?
For anyone interested (warning! shameless plug!) I'm trying to get a discussion guild up off the ground about the series, and would dearly love to have members. If you feel so inclined, please come check it out. Otherwise, just chatter here. wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 1:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 3:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 7:17 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 7:53 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:33 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:39 pm
|
|
|
|
Oh dear, Harry Potter is one of those hot spots that pokes me with all the firey pitchforks of HELL. Probably because I'm a diehard Lord of the Rings fan and all the comparisons between the two book series make me froth at the mouth. sweatdrop
Actually, I was fairly indifferent to the series for quite a while. I read the first book right before the first movie came out, because I try to never see a movie without reading the novel first. I was... unimpressed. It wasn't bad, I just don't think it was worth the hype it was getting and nothing about it convinced me that I needed to read the rest. While I enjoyed the concept, the writing itself was dull, the characterizations boring and the plot pretty standard fantasy fare. The "Young Wizards" series did a much better job with a similar theme, but for some reason you don't see people going crazy over those books.
Then, I got stuck in Barnes & Noble on the day that the fifth book was released. That alone was enough to turn my indifference into a hate of which belongs to the ages. I barely was able to pick up my man (who works there), get out of the building, to my car and out of the parking lot without (intentionally or unintentionally) killing about a MILLION SCREAMING HARRY POTTER FANS.
So yeah, needless to say, not a fan. xd And, uh, I'm not sure they're really appropriate for an honors senior thesis, since I didn't really find any deep, timeless themes... at least in the first one. But then, your teachers may be far more lenient than mine were. If I were to try to do similar with a fantasy book, even Lord of the Rings, or a sci-fi, even Asimov, my teachers would have thrown a screaming fit. gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:51 pm
|
|
|
|
Seeress So yeah, needless to say, not a fan. xd And, uh, I'm not sure they're really appropriate for an honors senior thesis, since I didn't really find any deep, timeless themes... at least in the first one. But then, your teachers may be far more lenient than mine were. If I were to try to do similar with a fantasy book, even Lord of the Rings, or a sci-fi, even Asimov, my teachers would have thrown a screaming fit. gonk
You'd be surprised, if you can get past the first book. It's definately not a prime example of what the series becomes, and it is atypical fantasy. It picks up momentum after book three and becomes more complicated. Comparing HP and LOTR, however is like comparing apples and oranges; they belong in the same genre and I've read and enjoyed both, but they're definately not on the same level.
As for it not being appropriate material for an honours thesis, it depends on what you're doing with it. It's popular culture, and while it may be, on the surface, lacking the complexitied of other similar novels, you can simply deal with it as a part of pop culture. There is, however, deep meaning and there are timeless themes in the series; I want to do my PhD in children's lit, so I'm doing a comparative study. But meaning and themes are to be found in any body of literature provided a person is willing to look for them.
And maybe my professors are more lenient. We've had honours' students in the past write on books like the Lord of the Rings trilogy; we have courses on sci fi and fantasy at our university, as is pretty standard for most universities who are dealing with modern lit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|