|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 7:35 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 6:39 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
OK, an old thread, but what the heck.
I define 'cult' in two ways, depending on context.
First, I may use the FBI's and other law enforcement agencies' definition, which suggests a smallish, frequently religious ,organization that is devoted to a single, charismatic leader that tends towards brain washing its members into psychological enslavement for illicit purposes.
However, as I also teach religious studies, I will also use the definition common to that discipline, which suggests a smallish religious organization that focuses upon a single charismatic leader and is frequently the beginning phase of what will eventually become a "full-blown" religion.
While there are similarities between the two the first example always has pejorative connotations while the second does not. For example, under the second definition, and when we look back on it with modern eyes, Christianity in the 1st and 2nd centuries CE would have been a cult. However from the view of the Roman authority in Palestine during that time Christianity would have been considered a cult from the perspective of the first definition.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 9:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 7:31 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
Well, cult comes the Latin cultus which means "care, cultivation, worship," originally "tended, cultivated", the root of of modern words "culture" and "cultivate".
The agricultural connotations are interesting and important I think, connecting the idea of the cultus to that of care and growth as well as its more usual (today anyway) connotations.
However, I'm not sure anyone uses the term that way any more and the the 19th century understanding, "devotion to a person or thing", is closer to modern usage.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 3:33 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
If this were true then you would have defined cultus as meaning "tended, cultivated", the past participle of colere, meaning to till. The connotation of worship is a later addition to the word.
Of course, you'd also have meant "companion" when you wrote society as the now common sense of the term didn't come into existence until the 17th century and by "traditionalist" you would presumably have meant someone who handed things over or surrendered to another person. The problem with tradition, as Frank Herbert rightly points out, is that there is always an older one.
As for who gave the term a negative connotation, I presume you mean this to be a reference to Christianity, and yet we find that the term is used quite positively, for instance, as a Catholic liturgical term.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 5:09 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 7:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:08 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2007 4:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:11 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
Nuadu If this were true then you would have defined cultus as meaning "tended, cultivated", the past participle of colere, meaning to till. The connotation of worship is a later addition to the word. Of course, you'd also have meant "companion" when you wrote society as the now common sense of the term didn't come into existence until the 17th century and by "traditionalist" you would presumably have meant someone who handed things over or surrendered to another person. The problem with tradition, as Frank Herbert rightly points out, is that there is always an older one. As for who gave the term a negative connotation, I presume you mean this to be a reference to Christianity, and yet we find that the term is used quite positively, for instance, as a Catholic liturgical term.
LOL!! Too bad she didn't get what you're trying to point out.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|